University patents: output and input indicators … of what?

This paper aims to clarify the nature of university patents as outputs of different types of research and inputs of diverse instruments of interaction, focusing on the case of the Polytechnic University of Valencia at departmental level. A patent production function tests what kind of research gives rise to patents. Several funding functions show for which instruments patents are a better input. University patents appear to be an output of costly and long-term-oriented research, either publicly or privately financed, and also the input of a certain type of interaction — not through licensing but through signalling competencies. The fear that university patents negatively affect the quality of research is not justified, as they are the outcome of research at the frontiers of science. However, it is true that university patents only stimulate interaction with those firms that have enough absorptive capacity. If interaction with less capable firms is intended, other instruments are required. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

[1]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[2]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation , 1996 .

[3]  M. Schmiemann,et al.  New Approaches to Technology Transfer from Publicly Funded Research , 2003 .

[4]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[5]  C. P. Ekas.  Technology Transfer in the United States , 1977 .

[6]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[7]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[8]  J. Wallmark,et al.  Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology , 1997 .

[9]  Bradford L. Barham,et al.  A Dynamic Count Data Analysis of University Ag-Biotech Patents , 2001 .

[10]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[11]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[12]  A. Piccaluga.  La valorizzazione della ricerca scientifica. , 2001 .

[13]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities , 1998 .

[14]  David Charles,et al.  Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property , 1999 .

[15]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation , 2001 .

[16]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[17]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Patenting Activity of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? , 2002 .

[18]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Research Productivity in a System of Universities , 1998 .

[19]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[20]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[21]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[22]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Networks of Inventors and the Location of University Research: An Exploration of Italian Data , 2002 .

[23]  A. Pakes,et al.  Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output? , 2003 .

[24]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities , 1998 .

[25]  H. Etzkowitz.  The Triple Helix: Academic–Industry–Government Relations , 1996 .