论文信息 - It's just not cricket: RoboCup and fair dealing in contract

It's just not cricket: RoboCup and fair dealing in contract

This paper tries to reconnect current debates on legal issues of agent mediated contract formation with the historical roots of agent technology in robotics. More specifically, it will explore the leverage that can be gained from the attempts to develop agents technology suitable for team sports for the question of how autonomous agents can conform to “good faith” or “fair dealing” requirements.

Burkhard Schafer | Burkhard Schafer

[1] R. Dias,et al. The English law of torts : a comparative introduction , 1976, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[2] J. Fleming,et al. An introduction to comparative law , 1977 .

[3] T. Wilhelmsson. Social contract law and European integration , 1995 .

[4] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents , 1996, ATAL.

[5] U. Mattei. Comparative law and economics , 1997 .

[6] Manuela M. Veloso,et al. Towards collaborative and adversarial learning: a case study in robotic soccer , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7] Gerhard Weiß,et al. Vicious strategies for Vickrey auctions , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[8] Emily M. Weitzenboeck. Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts , 2001, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[9] W. Alex Gray,et al. Market-based agent allocation in global information systems , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[10] M. Auer. Good Faith: A Semiotic Approach , 2002, European Review of Private Law.

[11] Emily M. Weitzenböck. Electronic Agents and Contract Performance: Good Faith and Fair Dealing , 2002 .