Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes at Failure

A centrifuge testing program was undertaken to investigate the failure mechanisms of geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes and to evaluate the assumptions in their design. Scaling laws were established so that factors of safety in the models would be identical to those in prototype structures. Failure of the models was characterized by well-defined shear surfaces through the toe of the slopes, which is in good agreement with current design methods for reinforced slopes based on limit equilibrium. The moment of failure was defined by a sudden change in the rate of settlements at the crest of the slope. In contrast to the assumption in current design procedures that failure should initiate at the toe of a reinforced slope, failure initiated at midheight of the slopes. Model deformations were found to depend on the backfill properties, but were essentially independent of the tensile strength and spacing of the reinforcements. The test results showed that overlapping reinforcement layers contribute to stability as they failed by breakage instead of by pullout when intersected by the failure surfaces. The experimental results also indicate that stability of the reinforced slopes is governed by the peak shear strength and not by the critical state shear strength of the backfill soil. A new distribution of maximum reinforcement forces with depth, which is consistent with the failure mechanism observed in the models, is proposed for geosynthetic reinforced soil slopes.

[1]  D Leshchinsky,et al.  SOFTWARE TO FACILITATE DESIGN OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED STEEP SLOPES , 1997 .

[2]  R. J. Fannin,et al.  Performance data for a slopped reinforced soil wall , 1990 .

[3]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[4]  Y. S. Kim,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Lateral Earth Support , 1982 .

[5]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  TESTING OF REINFORCED SLOPES IN A GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE , 1997 .

[6]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Design and construction guidelines for reinforced soil structures , 1800 .

[7]  M Ehrlich,et al.  WORKING STRESS DESIGN METHOD FOR REINFORCED SOIL WALLS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 1994 .

[8]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  FAILURE OF STEEP REINFORCED SOIL SLOPES , 1997 .

[9]  Ching-Chuan Huang,et al.  Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Sand Slopes Loaded with a Footing. , 1994 .

[10]  R. A. Jewell,et al.  Application of revised design charts for steep reinforced slopes , 1991 .

[11]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SLOPES : LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSES , 1994 .

[12]  I. Babuska,et al.  Finite Element Analysis , 2021 .

[13]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Creep and Stress Relaxation of Geogrids , 1997 .

[14]  Andrew Schofield,et al.  Cambridge Geotechnical Centrifuge Operations , 1980 .

[15]  D Leshchinsky,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SLOPES AT FAILURE. DISCUSSIONS AND CLOSURE , 2000 .

[16]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL STRUCTURES , 1989 .

[17]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Limit equilibrium as basis for design of geosynthetic reinforced slopes , 2000 .

[18]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  EVALUATION OF A CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR SOFT CLAY USING THE CENTRIFUGE , 1984 .

[19]  Mazen Elias Adib,et al.  Internal lateral earth pressure in earth walls , 1988 .

[20]  I. C. Pyrah,et al.  Finite element analysis of the collapse of reinforced embankments on soft ground , 1990 .

[21]  太郎 内村 Seismic Stability Against High Seismic Loads of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Structures , 1998 .

[22]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Unified Design Approach to Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes and Segmental Walls , 1995 .

[23]  Kenneth L. Lee,et al.  REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING WALLS , 1973 .

[24]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  North American Practice in Reinforced Soil Systems , 1990 .

[25]  I. Juran,et al.  Laboratory Model Study on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls , 1989 .

[26]  H. G. Stuit,et al.  Sand in the geotechnical centrifuge , 1995 .