Liquid-liquid two-phase flow patterns and mass transfer characteristics in rectangular glass microreactors

The flow of two immiscible fluids was investigated in rectangular glass microchannels with equivalent diameters of 269 and 400$\mu m$. Deionised water, dyed toluene and hexane were selected as probe fluids. Flow patterns were obtained for Y- and T-junction of two micro-channels and monitored by a photo-camera. Volumetric velocities of water and organic phase varied between 1 and 6ml/h. The formation mechanism of slug and parallel flow was studied and the mass transfer performances of two flow patterns were compared. The shape of the interface between the immiscible liquids was controlled by a competition between the viscous forces and the local interfacial tension. The flow patterns could be correlated with the mean Capillary and Reynolds numbers. The mass transfer coefficients for parallel and slug flow were determined using instantaneous eutralisation (acid–base) reaction. The two flow patterns showed the same global volumetric mass transfer coefficients in the range of 0. 2–0. 5 ${s}^{-1}$, being affected mainly by the base concentration in water for parallel flow and by the linear velocity in the case of the slug flow.

[1]  L. Luo,et al.  Hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics in gas–liquid flow through a rectangular microchannel , 2007 .

[2]  S. Quake,et al.  Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[3]  Yuchao Zhao,et al.  Liquid‐liquid two‐phase flow patterns in a rectangular microchannel , 2006 .

[4]  M. N. Kashid,et al.  Internal Circulation within the Liquid Slugs of a Liquid-Liquid Slug-Flow Capillary Microreactor , 2005 .

[5]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Insight into Theories of Heat and Mass Transfer at the Solid-Fluid Interface Using Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation , 2007 .

[6]  Armand Ajdari,et al.  Droplet Control for Microfluidics , 2005, Science.

[7]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels , 2004 .

[8]  W. Beek,et al.  The influence of the driving force in liquid—liquid extraction—a study of mass transfer with and without interfacial turbulence under well-defined conditions , 1967 .

[9]  J. Burns,et al.  Development of a Microreactor for Chemical Production , 1999 .

[10]  Muhammad Akbar,et al.  On gas–liquid two-phase flow regimes in microchannels , 2003 .

[11]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Multiphase monolith reactors: Chemical reaction engineering of segmented flow in microchannels , 2005 .

[12]  Albert Renken,et al.  Microstructured reactors for catalytic reactions , 2005 .

[13]  D. Beebe,et al.  Controlled microfluidic interfaces , 2005, Nature.

[14]  N. Harries,et al.  A numerical model for segmented flow in a microreactor , 2003 .

[15]  David W. Agar,et al.  Hydrodynamics of liquid–liquid slug flow capillary microreactor: Flow regimes, slug size and pressure drop , 2007 .

[16]  Wolfgang Ehrfeld,et al.  State-of-the-art in microreaction technology : concepts, manufacturing and applications , 1999 .

[17]  N. Kovalchuk,et al.  Marangoni instability and spontaneous non-linear oscillations produced at liquid interfaces by surfactant transfer. , 2006, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[18]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale , 2005 .

[19]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[20]  H. Löwe,et al.  Chemistry in microstructured reactors. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  D. Agar,et al.  The capillary-microreactor: a new reactor concept for the intensification of heat and mass transfer in liquid–liquid reactions , 2003 .

[22]  E. Ruckenstein Mass transfer in the case of interfacial turbulence induced by the marangoni effect , 1968 .

[23]  T. Sherwood,et al.  Interfacial Phenomena in Liquid Extraction , 1957 .

[24]  S. Lomel,et al.  The Microreactor: A Systematic and Efficient Tool for the Transition from Batch to Continuous Process? , 2006 .

[25]  D. Barrow,et al.  Enhancement of Reaction Rates by Segmented Fluid Flow in Capillary Scale Reactors , 2006 .

[26]  Volker Hessel,et al.  Organic Synthesis with Microstructured Reactors , 2005 .

[27]  David W. Agar,et al.  Liquid−Liquid Slug Flow in a Capillary: An Alternative to Suspended Drop or Film Contactors , 2007 .

[28]  J. Burns,et al.  The intensification of rapid reactions in multiphase systems using slug flow in capillaries. , 2001, Lab on a chip.