Supply's Growing Status and Influence: A Sixteen‐Year Perspective

SUMMARY The recent completion of a major survey of large North American supply organizations in 2003 permits a longitudinal perspective on supply roles and responsibilities over a 16-year period. The latest survey complements two earlier studies in 1987 and 1995. All three surveys counted at least 280 responding large North American supply organizations, thereby providing a valuable opportunity to examine trends and changes over time. Major areas of investigation for respondents in both the manufacturing and services sectors include supply organizational structure, supply chain responsibilities, and chief purchasing officer (CPO) reporting line, title and background. This research provides solid evidence that in both manufacturing and services, today's CPOs have greater responsibilities, report higher in the organization and carry more significant titles than their predecessors. The conclusion is that, at least in large North American companies, supply has grown substantially in corporate status and influence since 1987, a particularly welcome discovery.

[1]  J. Landry China: Put People First , 1997 .

[2]  H. Fearon Organizational Relationships in Purchasing , 1988 .

[3]  S. Gellerman In organizations, as in architecture, form follows function , 1990 .

[4]  M. Leenders,et al.  Determinants of purchasing team usage in the supply chain , 2002 .

[5]  Clifford P. McCue,et al.  Centralized vs. decentralized purchasing: current trends in governmental procurement practices , 2000 .

[6]  R. Herzlinger Can we control health care costs? , 1978, Harvard business review.

[7]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Status and Recognition of the Purchasing Function in the Electronics Industry , 1996 .

[8]  M. Cooper,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PURCHASING AND LOGISTICS STRATEGY. , 1993 .

[9]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  ORGANIZATION DESIGN AND THE LIFE‐CYCLES OF PRODUCTS [1] , 1985 .

[10]  Warren Boeker,et al.  The Development and Institutionalization of Subunit Power in Organizations. , 1989 .

[11]  Clifford P. McCue,et al.  A comparison of purchasing’s organizational roles and responsibilities in the public and private sector , 2003 .

[12]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Trends in Materials Management , 1987 .

[13]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power , 1977 .

[14]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[15]  K. Cottrill REFORGING THE SUPPLY CHAIN , 1997 .

[16]  M. Leenders,et al.  Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Purchasing Organizations , 1998 .

[17]  R. Trent The Use of Organizational Design Features in Purchasing and Supply Management , 2004 .

[18]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  The impact of the centralized structuring of logistics activities on span of control, formalization and performance , 1989 .