CONFIDE: A Collective Decision-Making Procedure Using Confidence Estimates of Individual Judgements

An algorithm (termed CONFIDE) is proposed that may capture many of the benefits of group decision making without the necessity of face-to-face interaction. The algorithm allows individual decision makers to differentially weight the contributions from members according to the confidence with which each member holds to their opinions. The CONFIDE algorithm is compared to both face-to-face group decisions and simple averaging of group members opinions on the Lost-at-Sea ranking task. Results indicate that, in terms of decision quality, the CONFIDE algorithm produces solutions equal to that of the face-to-face group decision method and significantly better than the solution achieved by simple averaging of group members responses.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Mannix,et al.  Organizations as Resource Dilemmas: The Effects of Power Balance on Coalition Formation in Small Groups , 1993 .

[2]  Paul Gray,et al.  Group decision support systems , 1987, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Dennis P. Slevin.  Observations on the Invalid Scoring Algorithm of "NASA" and Similar Consensus Tasks , 1978 .

[4]  M. C. Er,et al.  The anonymity and proximity factors in group decision support systems , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[6]  J. William Pfeiffer,et al.  Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators , 1977 .

[7]  Nelson Phelps.  Mountain Bell: program for managers , 1985 .

[8]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[9]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Group decision making at a multialternative task: Extremity, interfaction distance, pluralities, and issue importance , 1992 .

[10]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[11]  R J Mockler,et al.  Using computer software to improve group decision-making. , 1991, Long range planning.

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[13]  B. Brown,et al.  THE DELPHI METHOD, IV: EFFECT OF PERCENTILE FEEDBACK AND FEED-IN OF RELEVANT FACTS, , 1970 .

[14]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[15]  T. Osberg,et al.  Self-Prediction: Exploring the Parameters of Accuracy , 1986 .

[16]  Neil McK. Agnew,et al.  Bounded rationality: Fallible decisions in unbounded decision space , 1986 .

[17]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[18]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making☆ , 1992 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[20]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Aggregating Subjective Forecasts: Some Empirical Results , 1985 .

[21]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[22]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[23]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best-member strategy , 1982 .

[24]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  A system for group production planning in manufacturing , 1993 .

[25]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[26]  Norman Crolee Dalkey,et al.  An experimental study of group opinion , 1969 .

[27]  W. Dyer,et al.  Team Building: Issues and Alternatives , 1977 .

[28]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[29]  I. Steiner.  Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. , 1966, Behavioral science.

[30]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[31]  P. Goodman.  Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[32]  Mark McNeilly,et al.  Using electronic meeting systems for collaborative planning at IBM Rochester , 1994 .

[33]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[34]  E. Lawler.  High-Involvement Management , 1986 .

[35]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  A note on aggregating opinions , 1978 .

[36]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[37]  Frederick C. Miner,et al.  Group versus individual decision making: An investigation of performance measures, decision strategies, and process losses/gains , 1984 .

[38]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences. , 1970 .

[39]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[40]  Reagan M. Ramsower,et al.  Telecommuting: The Organizational and Behavioral Effects of Working at Home , 1985 .

[41]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[42]  R. H. Franke.  The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement OrganizationThe Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization By LawlerEdward E.III, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992—371 pages. $29.95 , 1992 .

[43]  Roger K. Blashfield,et al.  Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges , 1978 .

[44]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆ , 1992 .

[45]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[46]  R. Hogarth.  Methods for Aggregating Opinions , 1977 .

[47]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  A framework for supporting distributed group decision-making , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[48]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[49]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[50]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Quality of Group Judgment , 1977 .

[51]  Kevin Keasey,et al.  Consensus and accuracy in accounting studies of decision-making: A note on a new measure of consensus , 1989 .

[52]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[53]  T. Osberg,et al.  The Relative Accuracy of Self-Predictions and Judgments by Others in Psychological Assessment , 1981 .

[54]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .