How surrounds affect chromaticity discrimination.

Chromatic discrimination thresholds were measured with and without surrounds along two cardinal axes of chromaticity space. On one axis the level of short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS)-cone excitation was varied for constant long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS)-cone and medium-wavelength-sensitive (MWS)-cone excitations, and on the other axis there were equal and opposite changes in LWS-cone and MWS-cone excitations for constant levels of SWS-cone excitation. Results for two of three observers showed that with a dark surround, discrimination mediated by SWS cones was regulated by the level of SWS-cone excitation of the starting chromaticity, showing a function with the form of a threshold-versus-radiance function. For an equiluminant white or yellow surround, the discrimination for all three observers showed a minimum at the level of SWS-cone excitation of the surround, giving a V-shaped function for the white surround. An additional experiment with dimmer white surrounds indicated that while the minimum remained at the white point, the function gradually changed toward the shape with a dark surround. Discrimination thresholds mediated by LWS and MWS cones with a dark surround showed a minimum near the LWS-cone excitation of equal-energy white, giving a V-shaped function. The effect of yellow and white surrounds was to deepen the V. The data can be described by a model of chromatic discrimination incorporating a threshold term, a cone gain control, and an opponent gain control into two equations, one for SWS-cone discrimination and one for LWS-cone and MWS-cone discrimination.

[1]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Chromatic discrimination with variation in chromaticity and luminance: Data and theory , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Krauskopf,et al.  Color discrimination and adaptation , 1992, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Krauskopf,et al.  Adaptation and Color Discrimination , 1991 .

[4]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Analysis of color-matching ellipses in a cone-excitation space. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Robert M. Boynton,et al.  Chromatic difference steps of moderate size measured along theoretically critical axes , 1980 .

[6]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Effects of chromatic adaptation on color discrimination and color appearance , 1979, Vision Research.

[7]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  J. J. Vos.  Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer , 1978 .

[9]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  The gap effect: Chromatic and achromatic visual discrimination as affected by field separation , 1977 .

[10]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Pointer.  Color discrimination as a function of observer adaptation. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  G. Wyszecki,et al.  New color-matching ellipses. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  C. Enroth-Cugell.  The Visual System: Neurophysiology and Psychophysics , 1962 .

[14]  Leo M. Hurvich,et al.  Opponent Chromatic Induction and Wavelength Discrimination , 1961 .

[15]  W. R. Brown.  The effect of field size and chromatic surroundings on colar discrimination. , 1952, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  D. B. Judd,et al.  Basic correlates of the visual stimulus , 1951 .

[17]  D. L. Macadam,et al.  Visual sensitivities to combined chromaticity and luminance differences. , 1949, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  D. L. Macadam.  Visual Sensitivities to Color Differences in Daylight , 1942 .

[19]  W D Wright,et al.  The sensitivity of the eye to small colour differences , 1941 .