Hierarchical model predictive control in fusion reactors

Nuclear fusion still has to pass several milestones on its way to successful energy production, one of them being successful plasma stabilization. The present article presents an innovative control implementation related to plasma control for the generation of electricity with magnetically confined plasma. The implementation has been carried out over a specific device of tokamak type, called Tokamak à Configuration Variable (TCV). This novel hybrid control design allows for real time implementation of an optimal model predictive control over a large scale complex system with small time constant. At each closed loop iteration, the full model is first controlled by a straightforward controller, then the output values are used for model reduction so that finally the discretized control system is optimized only for the variables of interest. In the case of the TCV, this novel hybrid model predictive control enhances the power availability on the actuators and extends the pulse duration. Thus, this control strategy will help to achieve fusion energy stated goal of “ignition”, where nuclear fusion generates as much energy as it is needed to start the reaction.

[1]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  Observer-based real-time control for the poloidal beta of the plasma using diamagnetic measurements in tokamak fusion reactors , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[2]  M. G. Sevillano,et al.  SLIDING-MODE LOOP VOLTAGE CONTROL USING ASTRA-MATLAB INTEGRATION IN TOKAMAK REACTORS , 2012 .

[3]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  Modelling and control of the UPV/EHU stellarator , 2015, 2015 23rd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED).

[4]  Jerzy Klamka,et al.  Controllability and minimum energy control of linear fractional discrete-time infinite-dimensional systems , 2014, 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA).

[5]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice - A survey , 1989, Autom..

[6]  Faa Federico Felici,et al.  Development and validation of a tokamak skin effect transformer model , 2012 .

[7]  Imad M. Jaimoukha,et al.  Modeling and control of TCV , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Faa Federico Felici,et al.  Development of real-time plasma analysis and control algorithms for the TCV tokamak using SIMULINK , 2014 .

[9]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice , 1988 .

[10]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Oscillating Water Columns Wave-Structure Interaction in Ocean Energy Plants , 2015 .

[11]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Control-oriented Automatic System for Transport Analysis (ASTRA)-Matlab integration for Tokamaks , 2011 .

[12]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Nuclear fusion control-oriented plasma current linear models , 2010 .

[13]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Control-oriented models for plasma magnetic confinement coils , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA).

[14]  A. Czornik,et al.  Lyapunov exponents for systems with unbounded coefficients , 2013 .

[15]  S. Malang,et al.  Fusion Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[16]  Magne S. Espedal,et al.  Parallel Simulation of Multiphase/Multicomponent Flow Models , 2005 .

[17]  B. P. Duval,et al.  A scoping study of the application of neutral beam heating on the TCV tokamak , 2011 .

[18]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Robust Sliding Mode Control for Tokamaks , 2012 .

[19]  Izaskun Garrido,et al.  ASTRA-Matlab Integration for the Control of Tokamaks , 2011 .

[20]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Low Effort Nuclear Fusion Plasma Control Using Model Predictive Control Laws , 2015 .

[21]  Stefano Coda,et al.  The science program of the TCV tokamak: exploring fusion reactor and power plant concepts , 2015 .

[22]  G. Cunningham,et al.  High performance plasma vertical position control system for upgraded MAST , 2013 .

[23]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Plasma equilibrium response modelling and validation on JT-60U , 2002 .

[24]  S. Alberti,et al.  Design studies of the dual-frequency operation of the W7-X/140GHz/1MW gyrotron at 126GHz for TCV and 168GHz for ITER , 2010, 35th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves.

[25]  Magne S. Espedal,et al.  A Convergent Algorithm for Time Parallelization Applied to Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .

[26]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  Sliding mode control of a tokamak transformer , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[27]  Artur Babiarz,et al.  On the number of upper Bohl exponents for diagonal discrete time-varying linear system , 2015 .

[28]  David Ward,et al.  On the physics guidelines for a tokamak DEMO , 2013 .

[29]  Izaskun Garrido Hernandez,et al.  ASTRA — Matlab integration for the control of tokamaks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation.

[30]  Adam Czornik,et al.  Alternative formulae for lower general exponent of discrete linear time-varying systems , 2015, J. Frankl. Inst..

[31]  Aitor J. Garrido,et al.  Internal inductance predictive control for Tokamaks , 2014, 2014 World Automation Congress (WAC).

[32]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Plasma current, position and shape feedback control on EAST , 2013 .

[33]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Realizing Steady State Tokamak Operation for Fusion Energy , 2009 .