Multi-level multi-criteria analysis of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles in the United States.

Historically, the U.S. waste collection fleet was dominated by diesel-fueled waste collection vehicles (WCVs); the growing need for sustainable waste collection has urged decision makers to incorporate economically efficient alternative fuels, while mitigating environmental impacts. The pros and cons of alternative fuels complicate the decisions making process, calling for a comprehensive study that assesses the multiple factors involved. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods allow decision makers to select the best alternatives with respect to selection criteria. In this study, two MCDA methods, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), were used to rank fuel alternatives for the U.S. waste collection industry with respect to a multi-level environmental and financial decision matrix. The environmental criteria consisted of life-cycle emissions, tail-pipe emissions, water footprint (WFP), and power density, while the financial criteria comprised of vehicle cost, fuel price, fuel price stability, and fueling station availability. The overall analysis showed that conventional diesel is still the best option, followed by hydraulic-hybrid WCVs, landfill gas (LFG) sourced natural gas, fossil natural gas, and biodiesel. The elimination of the WFP and power density criteria from the environmental criteria ranked biodiesel 100 (BD100) as an environmentally better alternative compared to other fossil fuels (diesel and natural gas). This result showed that considering the WFP and power density as environmental criteria can make a difference in the decision process. The elimination of the fueling station and fuel price stability criteria from the decision matrix ranked fossil natural gas second after LFG-sourced natural gas. This scenario was found to represent the status quo of the waste collection industry. A sensitivity analysis for the status quo scenario showed the overall ranking of diesel and fossil natural gas to be more sensitive to changing fuel prices as compared to other alternatives.

[1]  Debra R Reinhart,et al.  Emissions from U.S. waste collection vehicles. , 2013, Waste management.

[2]  E J Lee.  [특별강연] Renewable Energy Initiatives with RETScreen® and REDI in Canada , 2003 .

[3]  John G. Ingersoll,et al.  Natural Gas Vehicles , 1995 .

[4]  Bhushan Gokhale,et al.  Application of landfill gas as a liquefied natural gas fuel for refuse trucks in Texas , 2007 .

[5]  Ho-Chul Shin,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of landfill gas electricity generation in Korea using LEAP model , 2005 .

[6]  Yoshio Sato,et al.  Development of DME Engine for Heavy-duty Truck , 2006 .

[7]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  An Integrated Multi-Criteria System to Assess Sustainable Energy Options: An Application of the Promethee Method , 2005 .

[8]  Frederick C. Michel,et al.  Comparison of GHG emissions during manure, biosolids and yard trimmings composting , 2017 .

[9]  Piotr Drozdz.  Hybrid Refuse Truck Feasibility Study , 2005 .

[10]  K. Madani,et al.  Social Planner’s Solution for the Caspian Sea Conflict , 2014 .

[11]  Marta Herva,et al.  Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Oliver Sawodny,et al.  Location-based energy management optimization for hybrid hydraulic vehicles , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[13]  Francisco Aparicio,et al.  Comparison of GHG emissions from diesel, biodiesel and natural gas refuse trucks of the City of Madrid , 2009 .

[14]  Armin Jalalzadeh,et al.  Landfill site selection for Sarein, Iran , 2017 .

[15]  Sina Khatami,et al.  Water for Energy: Inconsistent Assessment Standards and Inability to Judge Properly , 2015 .

[16]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[17]  C. Hwang.  Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[18]  Oliver Sawodny,et al.  An investigation on the fuel savings potential of hybrid hydraulic refuse collection vehicles. , 2014, Waste management.

[19]  Alireza Afshari,et al.  Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem , 2010 .

[20]  J Rintala,et al.  Landfill gas upgrading with countercurrent water wash. , 2008, Waste management.

[21]  Igor Marić,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation in strategic environmental assessment for waste management plan, a case study: the city of Belgrade. , 2015, Waste management.

[22]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Water Footprint of Bio-energy and other primary energy carriers , 2008 .

[23]  V. Doyuran,et al.  Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems , 2006 .

[24]  Laura Read,et al.  A Multi-Participant, Multi-Criteria Analysis of Energy Supply Sources for Fairbanks, Alaska , 2013 .

[25]  Lee Gordon-Brown,et al.  Fuzzy Numbers and MCDM Methods for Portfolio Optimization , 2012 .

[26]  Josias Zietsman,et al.  Evaluation of In-Use Emissions from Refuse Trucks , 2009 .

[27]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[28]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies , 2011 .

[29]  E. R. Allen,et al.  Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Using Biofiltration , 1997 .

[30]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[31]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects , 2010 .

[32]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles , 2009 .

[33]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  An Approximate Measure of Value , 1954, Oper. Res..

[34]  Debra R Reinhart,et al.  Regional prediction of long-term landfill gas to energy potential. , 2011, Waste management.

[35]  Saija Rasi,et al.  Landfill gas upgrading with pilot-scale water scrubber: Performance assessment with absorption water recycling , 2012 .

[36]  Kaveh Madani,et al.  A system of systems approach to energy sustainability assessment: Are all renewables really green? , 2015 .

[37]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[38]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[39]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. , 2011 .

[40]  Márcio de Almeida D'Agosto,et al.  A financial and environmental evaluation for the introduction of diesel-hydraulic hybrid-drive system in urban waste collection , 2014 .

[41]  Markus G Kliffken,et al.  Hydraulic Hybrid Systems for Commercial Vehicles , 2007 .

[42]  Kaveh Madani,et al.  The Water Demand of Energy: Implications for Sustainable Energy Policy Development , 2013 .