A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study

Introduction: Pediatric cardiac arrest is an uncommon but critical life‐threatening event requiring effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation. High‐quality cardio‐pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential, but is poorly performed, even by highly skilled healthcare providers. The recently described two‐thumb chest compression technique (nTTT) consists of the two thumbs directed at the angle of 90° to the chest while having the fingers fist‐clenched. This technique might facilitate adequate chest‐compression depth, chest‐compression rate and rate of full chest‐pressure relief. Methods: 42 paramedics from the national Emergency Medical Service of Poland performed three single‐rescuer CPR sessions for 10 minutes each. Each session was randomly assigned to the conventional two‐thumb (TTHT), the conventional two‐finger (TFT) or the nTTT. The manikin used for this study was connected with an arterial blood pressure measurement device and blood measurements were documented on a 10‐seconds cycle. Results: The nTTT provided significant higher systolic (82 vs. 30 vs. 41 mmHg). A statistically significant difference was noticed between nTTT and TFT (p<.001), nTTT and TTHT (p < 0.001), TFT and TTHT (p = 0.003). The median diastolic preassure using nTTT was 16 mmHg compared with 9 mmHg for TFT (p < 0.001), and 9.5 mmHg for TTHT (p < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure using distinct methods varied and amounted to 40 vs. 22. vs. 26 mmHg (nTTT vs. TFT vs. TTHT, respectively). A statistically significant difference was noticed between nTTT and TFT (p < 0.001), nTTT and TTEHT (p < 0.001), and TFT and TTHT (p < 0.001). The highest median pulse pressure was obtained by the nTTT 67.5 mmHg. Pulse pressure was 31.5 mmHg in the TTHT and 24 mmHg in the TFT. The difference between TFT and TTHT (p = 0.025), TFT and nTTT (p < 0.001), as well as between TTHT and nTTT (p < 0.001) were statistically significant. Conclusions: The new nTTT technique generated higher arterial blood pressures compared to established chest compression techniques using an infant manikin model, suggesting a more effective chest compression. Our results have important clinical implications as nTTT was simple to perform and could be widely taught to both healthcare professionals and bystanders. Whether this technique translates to improved outcomes over existing techniques needs further animal studies and subsequent human trials.

[1]  M. Kuisma,et al.  Paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests--epidemiology and outcome. , 1995, Resuscitation.

[2]  J. Cho,et al.  A vertical two‐thumb technique is superior to the two‐thumb encircling technique for infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation , 2015, Acta paediatrica.

[3]  J. Menegazzi,et al.  Two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  Jonathan J Shuster,et al.  Chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue with increased compression to ventilation ratio during single rescuer pediatric CPR. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[5]  J. Menegazzi,et al.  Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  J. Tsou,et al.  Electromyography activity of selected trunk muscles during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 2014, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  A. Keenan,et al.  Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[8]  S. Leung,et al.  Evaluation of new two‐thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial , 2016, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  T S Miles,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW ON FATIGUE DURING INTERMITTENT HUMAN HAND‐GRIP EXERCISE AND RECOVERY , 1997, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[10]  Jesús López-Herce,et al.  Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 ection 6 . Paediatric life support an , 2015 .

[11]  L. Goldsmith,et al.  Comparison of a two-finger versus two-thumb method for chest compressions by healthcare providers in an infant mechanical model. , 2000, Resuscitation.

[12]  B. McNally,et al.  Survival After Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children , 2015, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[13]  D. Theriaque,et al.  Two-thumb technique is superior to two-finger technique during lone rescuer infant manikin CPR. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[14]  T. J. Appleton,et al.  Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1990, JAMA.

[15]  J. Menegazzi,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest , 1997 .

[16]  M. Hazinski,et al.  Pediatric Basic Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , 2010, Pediatrics.

[17]  R. Berg,et al.  Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Advances in Science, Techniques, and Outcomes , 2008, Pediatrics.

[18]  C. Abelairas-Gómez,et al.  Randomized comparison of two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression during infant resuscitation performed by paramedics , 2016 .

[19]  Daniel B Herren,et al.  Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[20]  Linda L. Brown,et al.  Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a CPR feedback device and refresher simulations (CPR CARES Study): a randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA pediatrics.

[21]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[22]  H. Halperin,et al.  Outcomes from low versus high-flow cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model of cardiac arrest. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[23]  R. Lewis,et al.  A prospective, population-based study of the epidemiology and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[24]  Jo Kramer-Johansen,et al.  Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. , 2006, Resuscitation.

[25]  B. Abella,et al.  Chest Compression Rates During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Are Suboptimal: A Prospective Study During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2005, Circulation.

[26]  J. Ładny,et al.  The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial. , 2017, Kardiologia polska.

[27]  R. Berg,et al.  Pushing harder, pushing faster, minimizing interruptions… but falling short of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation targets during in-hospital pediatric and adolescent resuscitation. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[28]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality targets are associated with improved arterial blood pressure during pediatric cardiac arrest. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[29]  David D. Salcido,et al.  Coronary Perfusion Pressure and Return of Spontaneous Circulation after Prolonged Cardiac Arrest , 2010, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[30]  Mark Terry,et al.  Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[31]  Ł. Szarpak,et al.  Does the use of a chest compression system in children improve the effectiveness of chest compressions? A randomised crossover simulation pilot study. , 2016, Kardiologia polska.