MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans

One substantial benefit of sexual reproduction could be that it allows animals (including humans) to react rapidly to a continuously changing environmental selection pressure such as coevolving parasites. This counteraction would be most efficient if the females were able to provide their progeny with certain allele combinations for loci which may be crucial in the parasite-host arms race, for example the MHC (major histocompatibility complex). Here we show that the MHC influences both body odours and body odour preferences in humans, and that the women’s preferences depend on their hormonal status. Female and male students were typed for their HLA-A, -B and -DR. Each male student wore a T-shirt for two consecutive nights. The next day, each female student was asked to rate the odours of six T-shirts. They scored male body odours as more pleasant when they differed from the men in their MHC than when they were more similar. This difference in odour assessment was reversed when the women rating the odours were taking oral contraceptives. Furthermore, the odours of MHC-dissimilar men remind the test women more often of their own actual or former mates than do the odours of MHC-similar men. This suggests that the MHC or linked genes influence human mate choice today.

[1]  C. Wedekind Mate choice and maternal selection for specific parasite resistances before; during and after fertilization. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  The genetics of body scent , 1987 .

[3]  A. Wolf Childhood Association, Sexual Attraction, and the Incest Taboo: A Chinese Case1 , 1966 .

[4]  B. Mach,et al.  A new approach for the analysis of HLA class II polymorphism: 'HLA oligotyping'. , 1990, Blood reviews.

[5]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[6]  Jerram L. Brown,et al.  Kin Recognition and the Major Histocompatibility Complex: An Integrative Review , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[7]  B J Mathieson,et al.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  A. Wolf Childhood Association and Sexual Attraction: A Further Test of the Westermarck Hypothesis , 1970 .

[9]  W. Potts,et al.  Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: a tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  R. Doty,et al.  Endocrine, cardiovascular, and psychological correlated of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle. , 1981, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  J. Klein Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex , 1986 .

[12]  W. Potts,et al.  Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition , 1992, Nature.

[13]  Read Online,et al.  The scented ape : the biology and culture of human odour , 1990 .

[14]  W K Potts,et al.  The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  W. Hauck,et al.  HLA sharing and fertility in Hutterite couples: evidence for prenatal selection against compatible fetuses. , 1988, American journal of reproductive immunology and microbiology : AJRIM.

[16]  A. Gilbert,et al.  Olfactory discrimination of mouse strains (Mus musculus) and major histocompatibility types by humans (Homo sapiens). , 1986, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  E. Boyse,et al.  Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types , 1979, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  Edward K. Wakeland,et al.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype , 1991, Nature.

[19]  P. Verrell,et al.  Major histocompatibility antigens and spontaneous abortion: an evolutionary perspective. , 1990, Medical hypotheses.

[20]  P. Patrizio,et al.  Human leukocyte antigen compatibility and failure to achieve a viable pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology. , 1991, Acta Europaea fertilitatis.

[21]  Children of the Kibbutz , 1959 .

[22]  T. Laitinen A Set of MHC Haplotypes Found Among Finnish Couples Suffering From Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions , 1993, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology.

[23]  D. Stoddart The scented ape , 1990 .

[24]  C. Wedekind,et al.  Handicaps not obligatory in sexual selection for resistance genes. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  D. Alcalay,et al.  HLA Antigen‐Sharing in Couples With Repeated Spontaneous Abortions and the Birthweight of Babies in Successful Pregnancies , 1991, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[26]  T. Gill,et al.  Sharing of human leukocyte antigens in primary and secondary recurrent spontaneous abortions. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  R. May When to be incestuous , 1979, Nature.

[28]  C. Wysocki,et al.  Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice. , 1983, Science.

[29]  A. Beer,et al.  Pregnancy outcome in human couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions: HLA antigen profiles; HLA antigen sharing; female serum MLR blocking factors; and paternal leukocyte immunization. , 1985, Experimental and clinical immunogenetics.

[30]  T. Kameda,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of the HLA sharing of recurrent spontaneous abortion couples in the Japanese population. , 1991, Tissue antigens.

[31]  Roman Ferstl,et al.  MHC-Related Odors in Humans , 1992 .

[32]  P. Hedrick Evolutionary Genetics of the Major Histocompatibility Complex , 1994, The American Naturalist.