Procedural knowledge for integrated modelling: Towards the Modelling Playground

Integration aims to bridge disciplines and bring together knowledge that is fragmented across these disciplines. However, practical integration in Natural Resource Management (NRM) remains out-paced by the increasing pressures on natural resources. Research must become more effective at producing tools appropriate for NRM praxis (IAASTD 2009).Quantitative integrated modelling (IM) offers NRM the precision of mathematical formalism for rigorously evaluating hypotheses, testing concepts and comparing management options. To support IM, software tools have made great leaps in recent years. On the other hand, the knowledge of how to apply this "cyber infrastructure" remains mostly tacit and no adequate guidelines are available to support project managers in choosing cyber infrastructure that is appropriate for a specific project.The objective of this paper is to define a framework and a benchmark against which the efficiency of integrated modelling for natural resource management (IM-NRM) processes can be evaluated. First, the IM challenge is characterized by defining complexity, knowledge requirements and, using concepts from organizational theory, three strategies of knowledge acquisition. These include individual learning, collaboration within staff and cooperation with third parties. Next, the three strategies are used to categorize the organizational challenge of IM-NRM with five metaphors. Cyber infrastructure plays a pivotal and distinct role in each metaphor by sharing knowledge across project members. One of these metaphors, the "Modelling Playground," is defined as an optimal combination of the three strategies.Finally, this perspective is used to describe two NRM projects, one from academia and one from a governmental program. Both case studies have undergone significant changes in organizational structure and in knowledge acquisition strategies. The initial choice of cyber infrastructure proved insufficient for these changes and resulted in significant adjustment costs.In conclusion, it is suggested that guidelines for cyber infrastructure used in NRM, which take into consideration the aspired goals, the constraining organizational context and incentive structures, are crucial to improve the effectiveness of NRM. It is also suggested that lesson learning be based on the framework of organizational theory, as well as an action-based approach, to create a test Modelling Playground as a learning hub.

[1]  M. B. Beck,et al.  GRAND CHALLENGES OF THE FUTURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING , 2008 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[3]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment modelling for water resource allocation and management: A generalised conceptual framework , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Dalle Molle,et al.  A Design for Framework-Independent Model Components of Biophysical Systems , 2008 .

[5]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  A model selection protocol to support the use of models for water management , 2007 .

[6]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Capturing the complexity of water uses and water users within a multi-agent framework , 2006 .

[9]  Anthony Jakeman Environmental modelling, software and decision support : state of the art and new perspectives , 2008 .

[10]  Klaus Mainzer,et al.  Thinking in complexity - the computational dynamics of matter, mind, and mankind, 5th Edition , 2013, Springer complexity.

[11]  David Silver,et al.  Monte-Carlo tree search and rapid action value estimation in computer Go , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Mats Svensson,et al.  Modelling framework (SeamFrame) requirements , 2006 .

[13]  Jürgen Mittelstraß,et al.  Transdisziplinarität - wissenschaftliche Zukunft und institutionelle Wirklichkeit , 2003 .

[14]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Scientific communication, international cooperation and capacity building for sustainable development , 1999 .

[15]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated Assessment Modelling , 1999 .

[16]  Helena Mitasova,et al.  Chapter Ten Free and Open Source Geospatial Tools for Environmental Modelling and Management , 2008 .

[17]  Thorsten Arnold,et al.  Step by step calibration of an Integrated Model System for irrigation management , 2008 .

[18]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Knowledge-Brokering with Agent-Based Models: Some Experiences from Irrigation- Related Research in Chile , 2010 .

[20]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Organizational Learning Mechanisms , 1998 .

[21]  Richard H. Day,et al.  Micro foundations for meso and macro economic theory , 2008 .

[22]  R. Landauer,et al.  Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind , 1995 .

[23]  Ayalew Kassahun,et al.  Quality assurance in model based water management - review of existing practice and outline of new approaches , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Free and Open Source Geospatial Tools for Environmental Modeling and Management , 2006 .

[25]  Thorsten Arnold,et al.  Modificación del modelo WaSiM-ETH para mejorar su aplicación en áreas regadas , 2009 .

[26]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Post-Normal Science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[28]  Thomas Berger,et al.  An agent-based simulation model of human-environment interactions in agricultural systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Irrigation Management in Chile: Integrated Modeling of Access toWater , 2010 .

[30]  Marc Mogalle Management transdisziplinärer Forschungsprozesse , 2001 .

[31]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Good Modelling Practice , 2008 .

[32]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management , 2004 .

[33]  Thorsten Arnold,et al.  Linking farm economics and hydrology: Model integration for watershed-level irrigation management applied to Chile , 2010 .

[34]  David K. Arctur,et al.  Addressing cultural and institutional barriers to data and model interoperability , 2008 .

[35]  Tibor Müller,et al.  Modelling in Natural Sciences: Design, Validation and Case Studies , 2010 .

[36]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[37]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda: A bio-economic multi-agent systems approach , 2007 .

[38]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[39]  H. Herren,et al.  Executive summary of the synthesis report of the international assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD) , 2009 .

[40]  T. Nocke,et al.  Techniques for Quality Assurance of Models in a Multi-Run Simulation Environment , 2005 .

[41]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[42]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[44]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives , 2007 .

[45]  Jörg Schulla,et al.  Hydrologische Modellierung von Flussgebieten zur Abschätzung der Folgen von Klimaänderungen , 1997 .

[46]  Robert M. Argent,et al.  An overview of model integration for environmental applications--components, frameworks and semantics , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries , 2003 .

[48]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  C. Argyris Good communication that blocks learning , 1994 .

[50]  O. Williamson The economic institutions of capitalism , 1985 .

[51]  Hamil Uribe,et al.  Modificación del modelo hidrológico WaSiM-ETH para mejorar su aplicación en áreas regadas , 2009 .

[52]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[53]  Andrea Emilio Rizzoli,et al.  Integrated Modelling Frameworks for Environmental Assessment and Decision Support , 2008 .

[54]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..