Transient VRM Response From a Large Circular Loop Over a Conductive and Magnetically Viscous Half-Space

To effectively characterize the impact of viscous remanent magnetization (VRM) on the transient electromagnetic response, we present a set of analytical expressions for the vertical and radial VRM responses generated by a large circular loop over a magnetically viscous half-space. For a step-off excitation, Néel relaxation theory is used to express the VRM within the half-space as the product of a static on-time magnetization and a time-dependent aftereffect function. Through heuristic and empirical approximations to the elliptic integral of the second kind, we are able to convert Hankel integral-based expressions for static fields into simplified analytical expressions. These were validated with a numerical 1-D forward modeling code. Analytical expressions show that VRM responses are largest near the transmitter wire, and that at the center of a large loop, the strength of the VRM response is inversely proportional to the loop’s radius. We also present an estimate of the crossover time from which the VRM signal starts to dominate the transient response. We found that later crossover times were observed near the centers of large loops and that crossover times were much earlier near the transmitter wire. Also, the magnetic flux density has an earlier crossover time compared with its time derivative. To lower or remove the VRM response in an anticipated survey, our analytical expressions can be used straightforwardly to choose an appropriate loop size, identify the VRM response time window, and select an optimal set of time channels.

[1]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Magnetic forward modelling and inversion for high susceptibility , 2006 .

[2]  N. Kozhevnikov,et al.  The magnetic relaxation effect on TEM responses of a uniform earth , 2008 .

[3]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  OF MAGNETIC SOILS AT A UXO REMEDIATION SITE IN KAHO ' OLAWE HAWAII , 2005 .

[4]  G. Buselli,et al.  The effect of near-surface superparamagnetic material on electromagnetic measurements , 1982 .

[5]  J. Foley,et al.  The influence of magnetic viscosity on electromagnetic sensors , 2003 .

[6]  Avraham Adler,et al.  Lambert-W Function , 2015 .

[7]  M. Nabighian Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space; an approximate representation , 1979 .

[8]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Magnetic Soils On TEM Measurements For UXO Detection , 2002 .

[9]  Marc Acheroy,et al.  Modeling the Response of Electromagnetic Induction Sensors to Inhomogeneous Magnetic Soils With Arbitrary Relief , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  T. Lee THE EFFECT OF A SUPERPARAMAGNETIC LAYER ON THE TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC RESPONSE OF A GROUND , 1984 .

[11]  Dwain K. Butler,et al.  Implications of magnetic backgrounds for unexploded ordnance detection , 2003 .

[12]  M. S. Tite,et al.  Magnetic viscosity, quadrature susceptibility, and frequency dependence of susceptibility in single‐domain assemblies of magnetite and maghemite , 1973 .

[13]  Sven Altfelder,et al.  Magnetic viscosity of tropical soils: classification and prediction as an aid for landmine detection , 2012 .

[14]  H. Worm On the superparamagnetic—stable single domain transition for magnetite, and frequency dependence of susceptibility , 1998 .

[15]  On the influence of distribution functions on the after-effect function of ferrofluids , 1995 .

[16]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  On the LambertW function , 1996, Adv. Comput. Math..

[17]  Yogadhish Das,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the effects of soil electromagnetic properties on metal detectors , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[18]  Remke L. van Dam,et al.  Spatial variability of magnetic soil properties , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  L. Pasion Inversion of time domain electromagnetic data for the detection of Unexploded Ordnance , 2007 .

[20]  Jung H. Kim,et al.  Algorithm 935: IIPBF, a MATLAB toolbox for infinite integral of products of two Bessel functions , 2014, TOMS.

[21]  B. Moskowitz Magnetic viscosity, diffusion after-effect, and disaccommodation in natural and synthetic samples. , 1985 .

[22]  Michel Dabas,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility and viscosity of soils in a weak time varying field , 1992 .

[23]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[24]  Y. T. Li,et al.  Integral and series representations of the dirac delta function , 2007, 1303.1943.

[25]  Yogadhish Das,et al.  Effects of soil electromagnetic properties on metal detectors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.