Comparative study of nail sampling techniques in onychomycosis

Onychomycosis is a common problem. Obtaining accurate laboratory test results before treatment is important in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to compare results of curettage and drilling techniques of nail sampling in the diagnosis of onychomycosis, and to establish the best technique and location of sampling. We evaluated 60 patients suffering from distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis and lateral subungual onychomycosis using curettage and vertical and horizontal drilling sampling techniques from three different sites of the infected nail. KOH examination and fungal culture were used for detection and identification of fungal infection. At each sample site, the horizontal drilling technique has a better culture sensitivity than curettage. Trichophyton rubrum was by far the most common pathogen detected by both techniques from all sampling sites. The drilling technique was found to be statistically better than curettage at each site of sampling, furthermore vertical drilling from the proximal part of the affected nail was found to be the best procedure for nail sampling. With each technique we found that the culture sensitivity improved as the location of the sample was more proximal. More types of pathogens were detected in samples taken by both methods from proximal parts of the affected nails.

[1]  H. Trau,et al.  Collection of fungi samples from nails: comparative study of curettage and drilling techniques , 2007, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[2]  H. Trau,et al.  Nail sampling in onychomycosis: comparative study of curettage from three sites of the infected nail , 2007, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[3]  M Feuilhade de Chauvin,et al.  New diagnostic techniques , 2006, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[4]  M. F. Chauvin New diagnostic techniques , 2005 .

[5]  F. Kianifard,et al.  A comparison of KOH and culture results from two mycology laboratories for the diagnosis of onychomycosis during a randomized, multicenter clinical trial: a subset study. , 2005, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association (Print).

[6]  H. Ishizaki,et al.  A Nail Drilling Method Suitable for the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis , 2005, The Journal of dermatology.

[7]  B. Elewski,et al.  The diagnosis of nail fungus infection revisited. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  B. Zimmer,et al.  Methods for diagnosing onychomycosis: a comparative study and review of the literature. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  D. Mehregan,et al.  The cost effectiveness of testing for onychomycosis versus empiric treatment of onychodystrophies with oral antifungal agents. , 1999, Cutis.

[10]  R. Scher Onychomycosis: therapeutic update. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  J. Leyden Pharmacokinetics and pharmacology of terbinafine and itraconazole. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  B. Elewski,et al.  Prevalence of onychomycosis in patients attending a dermatology clinic in northeastern Ohio for other conditions. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  H. Heikkilä Isolation of fungi from onychomycosis‐suspected nails by two methods: clipping and drilling , 1996, Mycoses.

[14]  B. Elewski Diagnostic techniques for confirming onychomycosis. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[15]  R. Atkinson,et al.  An improved method for the isolation of fungi in onychomycosis , 1973, The British journal of dermatology.