Acoustofluidic sonoporation for gene delivery to human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Significance Commercial strategies to deliver biomolecular cargo ex vivo (e.g., electroporation, lipofection) to clinically relevant cell lines are limited by toxicity, cost, and throughput. These technical limitations have inhibited development of these technologies into streamlined clinical platforms for manufacturing gene-modified stem cells and cancer immunotherapies. Here, we demonstrate an acoustofluidic platform capable of delivering plasmids with high throughput to human T lymphocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Acoustofluidic-treated cells showed evidence of cytosolic DNA delivery, endocytic DNA aggregation, and nuclear membrane rupture. Collectively, these observations demonstrate the utility of this method as a research tool for gene editing applications and mechanistic studies of plasma membrane and nuclear membrane repair. Advances in gene editing are leading to new medical interventions where patients’ own cells are used for stem cell therapies and immunotherapies. One of the key limitations to translating these treatments to the clinic is the need for scalable technologies for engineering cells efficiently and safely. Toward this goal, microfluidic strategies to induce membrane pores and permeability have emerged as promising techniques to deliver biomolecular cargo into cells. As these technologies continue to mature, there is a need to achieve efficient, safe, nontoxic, fast, and economical processing of clinically relevant cell types. We demonstrate an acoustofluidic sonoporation method to deliver plasmids to immortalized and primary human cell types, based on pore formation and permeabilization of cell membranes with acoustic waves. This acoustofluidic-mediated approach achieves fast and efficient intracellular delivery of an enhanced green fluorescent protein-expressing plasmid to cells at a scalable throughput of 200,000 cells/min in a single channel. Analyses of intracellular delivery and nuclear membrane rupture revealed mechanisms underlying acoustofluidic delivery and successful gene expression. Our studies show that acoustofluidic technologies are promising platforms for gene delivery and a useful tool for investigating membrane repair.

[1]  Wei Pang,et al.  Hypersonic Poration: A New Versatile Cell Poration Method to Enhance Cellular Uptake Using a Piezoelectric Nano-Electromechanical Device. , 2017, Small.

[2]  James C. Weaver,et al.  High-throughput Nuclear Delivery and Rapid Expression of DNA via Mechanical and Electrical Cell-Membrane Disruption , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  S. Shoham,et al.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  David R. Liu,et al.  Chemical Biology Approaches to Genome Editing: Understanding, Controlling, and Delivering Programmable Nucleases. , 2016, Cell chemical biology.

[5]  J F Glenn,et al.  Prospects and challenges. , 1967, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Stephen G. Young,et al.  An absence of lamin B1 in migrating neurons causes nuclear membrane ruptures and cell death , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Mark A. Kay,et al.  Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Rosemary J. Boltryk,et al.  HeLa Cell Transfection Using a Novel Sonoporation System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S. Zimmer,et al.  Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Yi-Wei Lee,et al.  Direct Cytosolic Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-Ribonucleoprotein for Efficient Gene Editing. , 2017, ACS nano.

[11]  Robert Langer,et al.  Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts. , 2018, Chemical reviews.

[12]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Three-dimensional manipulation of single cells using surface acoustic waves , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[14]  Donald B Kohn,et al.  Delivery of Genome Editing Reagents to Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells. , 2016, Current protocols in stem cell biology.

[15]  Sanghee Lim,et al.  Nuclear envelope rupture drives genome instability in cancer , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[16]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Review of Microinjection Systems , 2018 .

[17]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Bursting the Bubble - Nuclear Envelope Rupture as a Path to Genomic Instability? , 2017, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  Howard Bernstein,et al.  Cell engineering with microfluidic squeezing preserves functionality of primary immune cells in vivo , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Leslie Y Yeo,et al.  High frequency acoustic permeabilisation of drugs through tissue for localised mucosal delivery. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[20]  Daniel E Bauer,et al.  A genome editing primer for the hematologist. , 2016, Blood.

[21]  K. Jensen,et al.  In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery , 2016, Nature.

[22]  E. Jordan,et al.  Optimizing electroporation conditions in primary and other difficult-to-transfect cells. , 2008, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[23]  Linhong Li,et al.  Highly Efficient, Large Volume Flow Electroporation , 2002, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[24]  Randall J. Platt,et al.  Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[25]  Stephen G. Young,et al.  Fibroblasts lacking nuclear lamins do not have nuclear blebs or protrusions but nevertheless have frequent nuclear membrane ruptures , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  David R. Liu,et al.  Improving the DNA specificity and applicability of base editing through protein engineering and protein delivery , 2017, Nature Communications.

[27]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Barbara Engel,et al.  Clinical efficacy of gene-modified stem cells in adenosine deaminase–deficient immunodeficiency , 2017, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  David Gray,et al.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy: Progress and Lessons Learned. , 2017, Cell stem cell.

[30]  W. Zimmer,et al.  Nuclear entry of nonviral vectors , 2005, Gene Therapy.

[31]  David R. Liu,et al.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA , 2019, Nature.

[32]  C T W Moonen,et al.  Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[33]  Michiel Postema,et al.  Sonoporation: mechanistic insights and ongoing challenges for gene transfer. , 2013, Gene.

[34]  Leslie Y. Yeo,et al.  Acoustically-mediated intracellular delivery. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[35]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation: Mechanical DNA Delivery by Ultrasonic Cavitation , 2002, Somatic cell and molecular genetics.

[36]  Yuan Rui,et al.  Non-Viral Delivery To Enable Genome Editing. , 2019, Trends in biotechnology.

[37]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Gene therapy comes of age , 2018, Science.

[38]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration , 2016, Science.

[39]  Ying Li,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 delivery to hard-to-transfect cells via membrane deformation , 2015, Science Advances.

[40]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  Martyn Hill,et al.  Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[43]  Robert Langer,et al.  A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Peng Li,et al.  Acoustic tweezers for the life sciences , 2018, Nature Methods.

[45]  Michiel Postema,et al.  Efficient Gene Delivery by Sonoporation Is Associated with Microbubble Entry into Cells and the Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis Pathway. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  Hossein Baharvand,et al.  Evaluating Electroporation and Lipofectamine Approaches for Transient and Stable Transgene Expressions in Human Fibroblasts and Embryonic Stem Cells , 2015, Cell journal.