Pursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Oguzhan Alagoz | David J. Vanness | Elizabeth S. Burnside | Yirong Wu | Amy Trentham-Dietz | E. Burnside | Yirong Wu | A. Trentham-Dietz | O. Alagoz | D. Vanness
[1] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points. , 1996, Academic radiology.
[2] H. Lynch,et al. Psychologic Aspects of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Research Update for Clinicians , 1997 .
[3] R. Richards-Kortum,et al. A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[4] Marvin Zelen,et al. Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms , 2009 .
[5] C. Metz,et al. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.
[6] Natasha K. Stout,et al. Chapter 7: The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model , 2006 .
[7] E. Halpern,et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.
[8] J. Austoker,et al. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.
[9] Dimitra Koulocheri,et al. Pain in different methods of breast biopsy: emphasis on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. , 2008, Breast.
[10] H. Nelson,et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[11] M. Linver. Evidence-based Target Recall Rates for Screening Mammography , 2008 .
[12] X. Varas,et al. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[13] Madhavi Raghu,et al. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. , 2013, Radiology.
[14] C. Metz. Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[15] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Statistical properties of a utility measure of observer performance compared to area under the ROC curve , 2013, Medical Imaging.
[16] W. Youden,et al. Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.
[17] Thomas A Sellers,et al. Breast biopsy utilization: a population-based study. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.
[18] R. F. Wagner,et al. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods. , 2004, Academic radiology.
[19] K. Berbaum,et al. Large-core breast biopsy: abnormal salivary cortisol profiles associated with uncertainty of diagnosis. , 2009, Radiology.
[20] Noel T Brewer,et al. Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[21] S. Cummings,et al. Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[22] Anthony Howell,et al. Breast cancer risk-assessment models , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.
[23] John Eng. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: utility, reality, covariates, and the future. , 2013, Academic radiology.
[24] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.
[25] Steven P Poplack,et al. Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. , 2005, Radiology.
[26] Oguzhan Alagoz,et al. What Is the Optimal Threshold at Which to Recommend Breast Biopsy? , 2012, PloS one.
[27] D. Vanel. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.
[28] D. R. Lewis,et al. Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. , 2003, The oncologist.
[29] M J Schell,et al. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[30] Jessica W T Leung,et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. , 2005, Radiology.
[31] John M Boone,et al. Estimating the Relative Utility of Screening Mammography , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[32] R. F. Wagner,et al. Reader Variability in Mammography and Its Implications for Expected Utility over the Population of Readers and Cases , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[33] Vipat Kuruchittham,et al. The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[34] Kelly H. Zou,et al. Optimal thresholds by maximizing or minimizing various metrics via ROC-type analysis. , 2013, Academic radiology.
[35] H. D. de Koning,et al. Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 Years , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[36] N. Obuchowski. ROC analysis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.