Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents

Abstract The objective of this study was to develop count cut-points for three different accelerometer models: ActiGraph GT3X, RT3 and Actical to accurately classify physical activity intensity levels in adolescents. Seventy-nine adolescents (10–15 years) participated in this study. Accelerometers and oxygen consumption () data were collected at rest and during 11 physical activities of different intensities. Accelerometers were worn on the waist and was measured by a portable metabolic system: Cosmed K4b2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine cut-points. Cut-points for sedentary (SED), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) and vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) were 46, 607 and 818 counts·15s−1 to the vertical axis of ActiGraph; 180, 757 and 1112 counts·15s−1 to the vector magnitude of ActiGraph; 17, 441 and 873 counts·15s−1 for Actical; and 5.6, 20.4 and 32.2 counts·s−1 for RT3, respectively. For all three accelerometer models, there was an almost perfect discrimination of SED and MVPA (ROC >0.97) and an excellent discrimination of VPA (ROC>0.90) observed. Areas under the ROC curves indicated better discrimination of MVPA by ActiGraph (AUC=0.994) and Actical (AUC=0.993) when compared to RT3 (AUC=0.983). The cut-points developed in this study for the ActiGraph (vector magnitude), RT3 and Actical accelerometer models can be used to monitor physical activity level of adolescents.

[1]  Ann V Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  S. Going,et al.  Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  D. Heil Predicting Activity Energy Expenditure Using the Actical® Activity Monitor , 2006, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[4]  I. Janssen,et al.  Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  D. Bassett,et al.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  S. Grant,et al.  Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data , 2008, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[7]  R. Pate,et al.  Validation and calibration of the Actical accelerometer in preschool children. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  F. Gottrand,et al.  New validated thresholds for various intensities of physical activity in adolescents using the Actigraph accelerometer , 2011, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[9]  R. Mcmurray,et al.  Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  Bradley J. Cardinal,et al.  Measuring Children's Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors , 2011 .

[11]  T. Cole,et al.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Russell R. Pate,et al.  Validation and Calibration of an Accelerometer in Preschool Children , 2006, Obesity.

[13]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Validity and reproducibility of motion sensors in youth: a systematic update. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Shrikant I Bangdiwala,et al.  Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[17]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[18]  A. McManus,et al.  Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for ambulation and nonambulation in children. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[20]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[22]  Issa Zakeri,et al.  Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  F. Gottrand,et al.  Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for various patterns of physical activity in children and adolescents , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[24]  J. Fischer,et al.  Combining accelerometry and HR for assessing preschoolers' physical activity. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[26]  Maurice R Puyau,et al.  A longitudinal study of fitness and activity in girls predisposed to obesity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  Stewart Trost,et al.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. , 2005, The Journal of pediatrics.

[28]  L. Sidossis,et al.  Assessment of energy expenditure in children using the RT3 accelerometer , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  A. Rowlands Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. , 2007, Pediatric exercise science.

[30]  S. Blair,et al.  Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children. , 2007, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[31]  Edward M. Winter,et al.  JUMPING: POWER OR IMPULSE? , 2005 .

[32]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Comparison of two methods to assess PAEE during six activities in children. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.