Beyond energy feedback

ABSTRACT The aims of this commentary are to generate thought and discussion about the potential role and value of energy feedback in future energy transitions. There is now a global research and policy effort devoted to developing energy feedback (e.g. from improved bills, metering or displays) in order to change energy-use behaviour and reduce demand. Within this, calls to go beyond conventional energy feedback through the use of disaggregation are increasingly common. An alternative approach is presented for how to go beyond energy feedback. Instead of focusing solely on generating larger energy savings, it is argued that new approaches need to consider how conventional energy feedback frames energy problems and shapes the agency and engagement of different actors. Three potential routes are highlighted for going beyond conventional approaches to energy feedback through emerging work on practice feedback, policy feedback and speculative design. Three core challenges for future work on energy feedback are: recognizing the multiple forms of energy-related feedback that shape everyday life; engaging with a much wider range of actors involved in shaping energy feedback loops; and using new approaches to energy-related feedback to reframe energy problems and establish new roles for actors engaged in energy transitions.

[1]  Jaap Jelsma,et al.  Innovating for Sustainability: Involving Users, Politics and Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Smart energy technologies in everyday life: smart Utopia? , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Corinna Fischer.  Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[4]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[5]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  Handy feedback: connecting smart meters with mobile phones , 2009, MUM.

[6]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart technology in the home: time for more clarity , 2018 .

[7]  Ruth Schwartz Cowan,et al.  More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave , 1985 .

[8]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Design feedback interventions for household energy consumption reduction , 2013 .

[9]  Tullia Jack.  Nobody was dirty: Intervening in inconspicuous consumption of laundry routines , 2013 .

[10]  Jing Liao,et al.  Measuring the energy intensity of domestic activities from smart meter data , 2016 .

[11]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[12]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[13]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? , 2010 .

[14]  E. Shove.  Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[15]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[16]  R. Rettie,et al.  Is social norms marketing effective?: A case study in domestic electricity consumption , 2013 .

[17]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Home Beyond Home , 2009 .

[18]  Rich Ling,et al.  Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill , 1995 .

[19]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Ruth Schwartz Cowan,et al.  More Work for Mother , 1983 .

[21]  Tom Roberts,et al.  Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications , 2016 .

[22]  Guy Walker,et al.  Co-designing the next generation of home energy management systems with lead-users. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[24]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart Metering Early Learning Project: Synthesis Report , 2015 .

[25]  Rebecca Whittle,et al.  From responsibility to accountability: Working creatively with distributed agency in office energy metering and management , 2015 .

[26]  Tom Hargreaves.  Smart meters and the governance of energy use in the household , 2014 .

[27]  M. Michael,et al.  Speculative Method and Twitter: Bots, Energy and Three Conceptual Characters , 2015 .

[28]  D. Béland.  Reconsidering Policy Feedback , 2010 .

[29]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback , 2015 .

[30]  Noortje Marres,et al.  The costs of public involvement: everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation , 2011 .

[31]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed With a Practice Theory Approach , 2009 .

[32]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Explaining Showering: A Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice , 2005 .

[33]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Exploring innovative community and household energy feedback approaches , 2018 .

[34]  Paul Pierson,et al.  When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change , 1993, World Politics.

[35]  Thomas Berker,et al.  “In the morning I just need a long, hot shower:” a sociological exploration of energy sensibilities in Norwegian bathrooms , 2013 .

[36]  Gj Raw,et al.  Energy Demand Research Project: final analysis , 2011 .

[37]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Energy Babble: Mixing Environmentally-Oriented Internet Content to Engage Community Groups , 2015, CHI.

[38]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[39]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[40]  Eric Helleiner,et al.  Subprime catalyst: Financial regulatory reform and the strengthening of US carbon market governance , 2013 .

[41]  M. Orsini,et al.  Household appropriation of electricity monitors , 2011 .

[42]  Miriam Fischlein,et al.  Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975 to 2012 , 2013 .

[43]  Michael Johnson,et al.  Leveraging Social Networks To Motivate Individuals to Reduce their Ecological Footprints , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[44]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Dragon-breath and snow-melt: Know-how, experience and heat flows in the home , 2014 .

[45]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Energy feedback in buildings: improving the infrastructure for demand reduction , 2008 .