Three-dimensional assessment of back symmetry in subjects with unilateral functional crossbite during the pre-pubertal growth phase: a controlled study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Since a high prevalence of back anomalies has been reported among subjects with crossbite, the aim was to assess the degree of back symmetry among subjects with (crossbite) and without (control) unilateral functional crossbite during the pre-pubertal growth phase. METHODS A group of 70 subjects (36 boys, 34 girls; 6.8 ± 1.2 years) in the primary or mixed dentition phase were included. Clinical assessment of head posture, shoulder, scapula and hip height were performed with the subject standing, and differences between the left and right side greater than 5 mm recorded. Asymmetry of the scapula and trunk prominence greater than 8 mm was recorded along with the prominence of thoracic and lumbar paravertebral musculature during the forward-bending test. Back symmetry was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively on colour deviation maps of superimposed mirrored three-dimensional back scans at a tolerance level of 2 mm. RESULTS No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the frequency of clinically assessed back anomalies. The percentage of back symmetry was slightly lower in the crossbite than that in the control group (71.4 ± 13.3% and 79.2 ± 12.1%, respectively). A significant association (P < 0.05) was seen between scapula plane inclination (OR = 3.41) and scapula prominence inequalities (OR = 3.29) and unilateral functional crossbite, while hip height inequalities (OR = 0.94) were more frequent in the control group. No associations were detected between the side of crossbite and side of prominence of back parameters. LIMITATIONS The use of different thresholds for clinical (5-8 mm) and three-dimensional (2 mm) symmetry assessment. CONCLUSIONS Although some degree of back asymmetry was detected in the crossbite group during the pre-pubertal growth phase, this asymmetry does not appear to be clinically relevant.

[1]  G. Perinetti StaTips Part III: Assessment of the repeatability and rater agreement for nominal and ordinal data , 2017 .

[2]  G. Perinetti,et al.  Does asymmetry in the stomatognathic system correlate with body posture impairments?: A systematic review , 2016 .

[3]  G. Perinetti StaTips Part I: Choosing statistical test when dealing with differences , 2016 .

[4]  Kristina Lopatienė,et al.  Relationships between Malocclusion, Body Posture, and Nasopharyngeal Pathology in Pre-Orthodontic Children , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[5]  D. Manfredini,et al.  The diagnostic potential of static body-sway recording in orthodontics: a systematic review. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  Yin Ding,et al.  A Correlational Study of Scoliosis and Trunk Balance in Adult Patients with Mandibular Deviation , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in association with unilateral functional crossbite in the primary, early, and late mixed dentition phases. , 2013, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  B. Drerup,et al.  Spine deviations and orthodontic treatment of asymmetric malocclusions in children , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[9]  S. Springate The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula. , 2012, European journal of orthodontics.

[10]  G. Häusler,et al.  Flying triangulation--an optical 3D sensor for the motion-robust acquisition of complex objects. , 2012, Applied optics.

[11]  G. Perinetti,et al.  Dentition phase and chronological age in relation to gingival crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase activity in growing subjects. , 2011, Progress in orthodontics.

[12]  J. Yang,et al.  Correlation between facial asymmetry, shoulder imbalance, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2011, Orthopedics.

[13]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Early crossbite correction: a three-dimensional evaluation. , 2009, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  L. Franchi,et al.  Phases of the dentition for the assessment of skeletal maturity: a diagnostic performance study. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  R. Martina,et al.  Is unilateral posterior crossbite associated with leg length inequality? , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[16]  H. Korbmacher,et al.  Associations between orthopaedic disturbances and unilateral crossbite in children with asymmetry of the upper cervical spine. , 2007, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  L. Kaplan,et al.  Occlusal patterns in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  S. Tecco,et al.  The Influence of an Experimentally-Induced Malocclusion On Vertebral Alignment in Rats: A Controlled Pilot Study , 2005, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[19]  S. Tecco,et al.  Relationship Between Cervical Lordosis and Facial Morphology in Caucasian Women with a Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2003, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[20]  J. Huggare,et al.  Trunk asymmetry and facial symmetry in young adults , 2003, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[21]  P. Raab,et al.  Mandibuläre Mittellinienverschiebungen und Asymmetrien des Halte- und Bewegungsapparates bei Kindern und Jugendlichen , 2002, Manuelle Medizin.

[22]  P H Buschang,et al.  Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  U. Ehmer,et al.  Beziehungen zwischen kieferorthopädischen und orthopädischen Befunden , 2000, Manuelle Medizin.

[24]  J. Huggare Postural disorders and dentofacial morphology. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[25]  J. Årtun,et al.  Changes in condylar postition and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  J. Huggare,et al.  Head posture and cervicovertebral anatomy as mandibular growth predictors. , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.

[28]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  F. Mongini,et al.  A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  U. Hirschfelder,et al.  Auswirkungen der Skoliose auf den Gesichtsschädel , 1983, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[31]  A. Prager Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Häufigkeit von Zahnstellungs- und Kieferanomalien bei Patienten mit Deformitäten der Wirbelsäule , 1980, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[32]  R. Mcrae Clinical Orthopaedic Examination , 1977 .

[33]  Kristina Lopatienė,et al.  An interdisciplinary study of orthodontic, orthopedic, and otorhinolaryngological findings in 12-14-year-old preorthodontic children. , 2013, Medicina.

[34]  G. Signoriello,et al.  DENTAL OCCLUSION AND BODY POSTURE IN GROWING SUBJECTS . A POPULATION-BASED STUDY IN 12-YEAR-OLD ITALIAN ADOLESCENTS , 2009 .

[35]  Kazuhito Arai,et al.  Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[36]  M. Pećina,et al.  Hereditary orthodontic anomalies and idiopathic scoliosis , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[37]  B. Solow,et al.  Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[38]  J. Huggare,et al.  Head posture and dentofacial morphology in subjects treated for scoliosis. , 1991, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[39]  C. Engstrom,et al.  Mandibular condyle morphology in relation to malocclusions in children. , 1989, The Angle orthodontist.

[40]  J. Huggare,et al.  Head posture and dentofacial asymmetries in surgically treated muscular torticollis patients. , 1989, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.