Non-porous magnetic micro-particles: comparison to porous enzyme carriers for a diffusion rate-controlled enzymatic conversion.

In this study the kinetics of conversion of a low-soluble substrate by an immobilized enzyme was investigated with respect to the diffusion limitation within porous and non-porous carriers. Non-porous micro-magnetic beads in comparison to conventional porous supports like Eupergit and Sepharose were tested. Due to their small diameters and their magnetic properties, micro-magnetic beads are especially applicable in diffusion rate-controlled processes in biological suspensions. The enzymatic reaction studied was the conversion of emulsified dirhamnolipid by immobilized Naringinase from Penicillium decumbens to monorhamnolipid and L-rhamnose. Taking into account mass transfer phenomena, the variation of the reaction effectiveness factor with increasing enzyme loading was estimated and compared with experimental efficiencies utilizing different enzyme loaded immobilized preparations. For comparison, carrier activities were also determined with the model substrate p-nitro-phenyl-rhamnoside. Intrinsic enzyme activities were thereby evaluated for porous supports. Highest specific activities were obtained with the micro-magnetic beads. These non-porous micro-beads demonstrated to be the most suitable carrier for bioconversion of a low-soluble substrate like rhamnolipids, where mass diffusional resistances in the three-phase reaction process are completely overcome. However, the smaller particle surface available limited the specific activity obtained at high protein loadings.

[1]  C. Syldatk,et al.  Immobilization of the hydantoin cleaving enzymes from Arthrobacter aurescens DSM 3747. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[2]  A. Mersmann,et al.  FLUID DYNAMICS AND MASS-TRANSFER IN STIRRED SUSPENSIONS , 1981 .

[3]  J. Bailey,et al.  Structure‐function relationships in immobilized chymotrypsin catalysis , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Wen‐Chien Lee,et al.  Protein and enzyme immobilization on non‐porous microspheres of polystyrene , 1998 .

[5]  G. Fasman,et al.  Physical and chemical data , 1976 .

[6]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[7]  C. Syldatk,et al.  An integrated microbial/enzymatic process for production of rhamnolipids and L‐(+)‐rhamnose from rapeseed oil with Pseudomonas sp. DSM 2874 , 2003 .

[8]  R. Köster,et al.  Evaluation of magnetic polymer micro-beads as carriers of immobilised biocatalysts for selective and stereoselective transformations , 2004, Biotechnology Letters.

[9]  H. Fazelinia,et al.  Influence of external mass transfer limitation on apparent kinetic parameters of penicillin G acylase immobilized on nonporous ultrafine silica particles. , 2002, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[10]  B. Schmidt,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of the rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1995, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  J. Iborra,et al.  A method for assaying the rhamnosidase activity of naringinase. , 1985, Analytical biochemistry.

[12]  T. Yamane On Approximate Expressions of Effectiveness Factors for Immobilized Biocatalysts , 1981 .

[13]  S. Friedlander A note on transport to spheres in stokes flow , 1961 .

[14]  Z. Bílková,et al.  Enzymes immobilized on magnetic carriers: efficient and selective system for protein modification. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[15]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[16]  T. Yamane,et al.  Overall Effectiveness Factor Incorporating Partition Coefficient for Gel-immobilized Enzyme Pellet , 1981 .