Joint Multi-Sensor Calibration and Multi-Target Tracking Based on Hierarchical Point Processes

On the basis of the multi-group multi-target probability hypothesis density (MGMT-PHD)filter and hierarchical point processes modeling, a new joint multi-sensor bias and multi-target state estimation algorithm is proposed in this paper. The parent processes is the set of the multi-sensor biases, the daughter processes is the set of multi-target state spaces corresponding to the multiple sensors. By separating the two interacting point processes, a large computational complexity arising from jointly estimating multi-sensor biases and multitarget states in an augmented high dimension state space for the existing methods can be avoided. When the MGMT-PHD filter is used to jointly estimating multi-sensor biases and multi-target states, the number of the sensors is known, that is to say it is not required to estimate the number of elements in the parent processes. In addition, each sensor independently obtains the corresponding measurement set, which means that the partition of the measurement set is determinate and unique. The implementation of the MGMT-PHD filter can be greatly simplified. Then, the particle implementation of the MGMT-PHD filter is proposed to jointly estimating the multi-sensor biases and multi-target states under nonlinear conditions.

[1]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Calibration of tracking systems using detections from non-cooperative targets , 2012, 2012 Workshop on Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF).

[2]  Junping Du,et al.  Gaussian mixture PHD filter for multi-sensor multi-target tracking with registration errors , 2013, Signal Process..

[3]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  The single-group PHD filter: An analytic solution , 2011, 14th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[4]  R. Mahler Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments , 2003 .

[5]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  PHD filters for nonstandard targets, II: Unresolved targets , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  First-moment filters for spatial independent cluster processes , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Kuo-Chu Chang,et al.  Sensor Calibration using In-Situ Celestial Observations to Estimate Bias in Space-Based Missile Tracking , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Hao Chen,et al.  Joint spatial registration and multi-target tracking using an extended probability hypothesis density filter , 2011 .

[9]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Particle filter for joint estimation of multi-object dynamic state and multi-sensor bias , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[10]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  A Unified Approach for Multi-Object Triangulation, Tracking and Camera Calibration , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  Statistical Multisource-Multitarget Information Fusion , 2007 .

[12]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  Approximate multisensor CPHD and PHD filters , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[13]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  A Consistent Metric for Performance Evaluation of Multi-Object Filters , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Resampling Methods for Particle Filtering , 2015 .

[15]  Ronald Mahler,et al.  Bayesian unified registration and tracking , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Chongzhao Han,et al.  Joint spatial registration and multi-target tracking using an extended PM-CPHD filter , 2011, Science China Information Sciences.

[17]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Calibration of Multi-Target Tracking Algorithms Using Non-Cooperative Targets , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.