Using LCA and Circularity Indicators to Measure the Sustainability of Textiles—Examples of Renewable and Non-Renewable Fibres

Reducing environmental impacts by increasing circularity is highly relevant to the textiles sector. Here, we examine results from life cycle assessment (LCA) and circularity indicators applied to renewable and non-renewable fibres to evaluate the synergies between the two approaches for improving sustainability assessment of textiles. Using LCA, impacts were quantified for sweaters made from fossil feedstock-derived and bio-based PET. These same sweaters were scored using four circularity indicators. Both sweaters showed similar fossil energy footprints, but the bio-PET raw material acquisition stage greenhouse gas, water and land occupation impacts were 1.9 to 60 times higher, leading to higher full life cycle impacts. These contrasts were principally determined by what raw material acquisition processes were considered outside the system boundary of the alternative feedstocks. Using circularity indicators, fossil-feedstock PET scored lowest (worst) because the feedstock was from a non-renewable source. These examples highlight the limitations of LCA: the renewability or non-renewability of raw materials is not fully considered, and contrasts in processes included within system boundaries can preclude equitable comparisons. For LCA to be suitable for quantifying sustainability, it should be complemented by circularity indicators capable of demonstrating the contrast between renewable and non-renewable raw materials, particularly in the case of textiles.

[1]  P. Newton,et al.  What Is Regenerative Agriculture? A Review of Scholar and Practitioner Definitions Based on Processes and Outcomes , 2020, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[2]  K. J. Watson,et al.  Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment , 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Patsy Perry,et al.  The environmental price of fast fashion , 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[4]  S. Agarwal.  Biodegradable Polymers: Present Opportunities and Challenges in Providing a Microplastic‐Free Environment , 2020, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[6]  N. Gill,et al.  Transformational adaptation on the farm: Processes of change and persistence in transitions to ‘climate-smart’ regenerative agriculture , 2019, Global Environmental Change.

[7]  Anne-Marie Boulay,et al.  Marginal and non-marginal approaches in characterization: how context and scale affect the selection of an adequate characterization model. The AWARE model example , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  K. J. Watson,et al.  Review of Methodological Choices in LCA-Based Textile and Apparel Rating Tools: Key Issues and Recommendations Relating to Assessment of Fabrics Made From Natural Fibre Types , 2019, Sustainability.

[9]  Clay S. Bell,et al.  Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  K. Laitala,et al.  Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type , 2018, Sustainability.

[11]  Mary Biddy,et al.  Exploring Comparative Energy and Environmental Benefits of Virgin, Recycled, and Bio-Derived PET Bottles , 2018, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.

[12]  M. Omara,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain , 2018, Science.

[13]  Dongyan Mu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bottled water: A case study of Green2O products. , 2018, Waste management.

[14]  Michael J. Lathuillière,et al.  The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE) , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Giuseppe Ioppolo,et al.  Environmental analysis of polyester fabric for ticking , 2018 .

[16]  Qinghai Li,et al.  Prediction of higher heating values of combustible solid wastes by pseudo-components and thermal mass coefficients , 2017 .

[17]  S. Patwary,et al.  Sustainable care of textile products and its environmental impact: Tumble-drying and ironing processes , 2017, Fibers and Polymers.

[18]  J. S. Dennis,et al.  Impact on the Polyester Value Chain of Using p-Xylene Derived from Biomass , 2017 .

[19]  Olga Troynikov,et al.  Towards sustainable and safe apparel cleaning methods: A review. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  R. Stamminger,et al.  Water and Energy Consumption in Domestic Laundering Worldwide – A Review , 2016 .

[21]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Chong Du,et al.  Carbon footprint of textile throughout its life cycle: a case study of Chinese cotton shirts , 2015 .

[23]  R. Dias,et al.  Biogenic fraction in the synthesis of polyethylene terephthalate , 2015 .

[24]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies: review and recommendations. , 2015, Waste management.

[25]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of bio-based plastics from sugarcane ethanol , 2015 .

[26]  S. Kim,et al.  Poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycling for high value added textiles , 2014, Fashion and Textiles.

[27]  Angelika Schmitz,et al.  Usage behaviour and related energy consumption of European consumers for washing and drying , 2014 .

[28]  J. S. Dennis,et al.  Impact of Biomass on Industry: Using Ethylene Derived from Bioethanol within the Polyester Value Chain , 2014 .

[29]  Susan Selke,et al.  A preliminary LCA case study: comparison of different pathways to produce purified terephthalic acid suitable for synthesis of 100 % bio-based PET , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[30]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[31]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[32]  James Thomas,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  H. Cai,et al.  Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use , 2012 .

[34]  Hong Huo,et al.  Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context , 2011 .

[35]  W. Ingwersen,et al.  Emergy as a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicator , 2011 .

[36]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling , 2010 .

[37]  R. Wever,et al.  Designing cradle-to-cradle products: a reality check , 2010 .

[38]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Antonio Luiz Ribeiro de Castro Morschbacker.  Bio-Ethanol Based Ethylene , 2009 .

[40]  R. Berner.  The long-term carbon cycle, fossil fuels and atmospheric composition , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Jeffrey S. Dukes,et al.  Burning Buried Sunshine: Human Consumption of Ancient Solar Energy , 2003 .

[42]  John Holmberg,et al.  Backcasting: A Natural Step in Operationalising Sustainable Development(*) , 1998 .

[43]  S. Wiedemann,et al.  Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Garments through Industrially Scalable Closed-Loop Recycling: Life Cycle Assessment of a Recycled Wool Blend Sweater , 2022 .

[44]  S. Olsen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Practice , 2018 .

[45]  Hanna Salmenperä,et al.  Increasing textile circulation—Consequences and requirements , 2017 .

[46]  Michael Wang,et al.  Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products , 2004 .