Membrane Localization of Scaffold Proteins Promotes Graded Signaling in the Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade

BACKGROUND Signaling through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade pathways can show various input-output behaviors, including either switch-like or graded responses to increasing levels of stimulus. Prior studies suggest that switch-like behavior is promoted by positive feedback loops and nonprocessive phosphorylation reactions, but it is unclear whether graded signaling is a default behavior or whether it must be enforced by separate mechanisms. It has been hypothesized that scaffold proteins promote graded behavior. RESULTS Here, we experimentally probe the determinants of graded signaling in the yeast mating MAPK pathway. We find that graded behavior is robust in that it resists perturbation by loss of several negative-feedback regulators. However, the pathway becomes switch-like when activated by a crosstalk stimulus that bypasses multiple upstream components. To dissect the contributing factors, we developed a method for gradually varying the signal input at different pathway steps in vivo. Input at the beginning of the kinase cascade produced a sharp, threshold-like response. Surprisingly, the scaffold protein Ste5 increased this threshold behavior when limited to the cytosol. However, signaling remained graded whenever Ste5 was allowed to function at the plasma membrane. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that the MAPK cascade module is inherently ultrasensitive but is converted to a graded system by the pathway-specific activation mechanism. Scaffold-mediated assembly of signaling complexes at the plasma membrane allows faithful propagation of weak signals, which consequently reduces pathway ultrasensitivity. These properties help shape the input-output properties of the system to fit the physiological context.

[1]  J. Hasty,et al.  Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[2]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[3]  E. Elion,et al.  MAP kinase pathways , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  B. Kholodenko.  Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  J E Ferrell,et al.  How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  E. Elion,et al.  The Ste5p scaffold. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[8]  P. Walter,et al.  The unfolded protein response coordinates the production of endoplasmic reticulum protein and endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  J. Thorner,et al.  Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[10]  M. Peter,et al.  Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo , 2000, Current Biology.

[11]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Coactivation of G Protein Signaling by Cell-Surface Receptors and an Intracellular Exchange Factor , 2008, Current Biology.

[13]  J E Ferrell,et al.  What Do Scaffold Proteins Really Do? , 2000, Science's STKE.

[14]  T. Hughes,et al.  Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins , 2001, Current Biology.

[15]  B. Cairns,et al.  Order of action of components in the yeast pheromone response pathway revealed with a dominant allele of the STE11 kinase and the multiple phosphorylation of the STE7 kinase. , 1992, Genes & development.

[16]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Yeast osmoregulation. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  Michael Knop,et al.  Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  Comparison of dose-response curves for alpha factor-induced cell division arrest, agglutination, and projection formation of yeast cells. Implication for the mechanism of alpha factor action. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Genes & development.

[20]  D. Morrison,et al.  Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[21]  J. Thorner,et al.  Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. , 1997, Science.

[22]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  The JNK Cascade as a Biochemical Switch in Mammalian Cells Ultrasensitive and All-or-None Responses , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  Frédéric Pincet,et al.  Membrane Recruitment of Scaffold Proteins Drives Specific Signaling , 2007, PloS one.

[24]  Jeffrey P. MacKeigan,et al.  Graded Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity Precedes Switch-Like c-Fos Induction in Mammalian Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  W. Kolch.  Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  M. White,et al.  Stimulus-Coupled Spatial Restriction of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activity Contributes to the Specificity of Signal-Response Pathways , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  E. Elion,et al.  Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[28]  M. Tyers,et al.  MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation , 2001, Current Biology.

[29]  A. Kamb,et al.  Graded mode of transcriptional induction in yeast pheromone signalling revealed by single‐cell analysis , 2001, Yeast.

[30]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSS1. , 1992, Genes & development.

[31]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases with Distinct Requirements for Ste5 Scaffolding Influence Signaling Specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  Rachel E. Lamson,et al.  Dual Role for Membrane Localization in Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade Activation and Its Contribution to Signaling Fidelity , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[34]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  Plasma membrane nanoswitches generate high-fidelity Ras signal transduction , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Matthias Peter,et al.  MAP kinase dynamics in response to pheromones in budding yeast , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  S Falkow,et al.  FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). , 1996, Gene.

[39]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[40]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway , 2004, Yeast.

[41]  S. Andrews.  Serial rebinding of ligands to clustered receptors as exemplified by bacterial chemotaxis , 2005, Physical biology.

[42]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[43]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  R. Deschenes,et al.  Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genes & development.

[45]  F. Posas,et al.  Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. , 1997, Science.

[46]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module , 2007, Current Biology.

[47]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[48]  B. Errede,et al.  Pheromone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[49]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Distinct Roles for Two Gα–Gβ Interfaces in Cell Polarity Control by a Yeast Heterotrimeric G Protein , 2008 .

[50]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[51]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[52]  N. Baker,et al.  Cell cycle withdrawal, progression, and cell survival regulation by EGFR and its effectors in the differentiating Drosophila eye. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[53]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Persistent Activation by Constitutive Ste7 Promotes Kss1-Mediated Invasive Growth but Fails To Support Fus3-Dependent Mating in Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[54]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. , 1998, Genes & development.

[55]  A. Neiman,et al.  A Membrane Binding Domain in the Ste5 Scaffold Synergizes with Gβγ Binding to Control Localization and Signaling in Pheromone Response , 2005 .

[56]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[57]  W. Miller,et al.  Processive phosphorylation: mechanism and biological importance. , 2007, Cellular signalling.

[58]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.