The Politics of Standards in Modern Management: Making the Project a Reality

In this paper, we explore the standardization of contemporary management knowledge, focusing in particular upon the role of 'standards' in creating and reifying 'organizational objects', with powerful consequences and with often unrecognized ethical implications. It is our argument that modernist beliefs in 'general, abstract and timeless ideas' (Brunsson et al., 2000, p. 173), enshrined in a universal and abstract rationality, results in the marginalization of more reflexive forms of rationality and the suppression of autonomy, creativity and discretion in organizations. To investigate the consequences of standardization, we take as the focus of our analysis a specific management model which has a significant and growing impact on many sectors of contemporary industry; that of project management. Drawing on the work of Timmermans and Berg (1997), Bowker and Star (1999) and Brunsson et al. (2000), we draw attention to the reification of the object of management; in this case, the project itself, as a transhistorical, 'real world' object. By tracing efforts to establish and institutionalize 'standards' in this and other fields of management, in particular through the creation and dissemination of a universal 'body of knowledge' for this field, we draw attention to the political and moral significance of the 'blackboxing' of knowledge. It is our broader intention here to help to denaturalize this organizational object, to legitimize other modes of knowledge and practice in the field, and thereby to reopen debate in this and other arenas of standardization. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007.

[1]  J. Menken,et al.  A Study of History , 1935, Nature.

[2]  Arnold J. Toynbee,et al.  A Study of History , 1948 .

[3]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[4]  M. Foucault.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[5]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[7]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting and the construction of the governable person , 1987 .

[8]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[9]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management , 1990 .

[10]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[11]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[12]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[13]  S. Toulmin.  Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[14]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[15]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[16]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. , 1991 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[18]  S. Barley,et al.  Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. , 1992 .

[19]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[20]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The management of projects , 1994 .

[21]  Kristian Kreiner.  In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments , 1995 .

[22]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia.  From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis , 1995 .

[23]  William R Duncan.  Developing a project-management body-of-knowledge document: the US Project Management Institute's approach, 1983-94 , 1995 .

[24]  C. Midler.  “Projectification” of the firm: The renault case , 1995 .

[25]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[26]  H Walta.  Dutch project-management body-of-knowledge policy , 1995 .

[27]  R Max Wideman.  Criteria for a project-management body of knowledge , 1995 .

[28]  J. Oleske,et al.  In search of the Holy Grail. , 1996, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[29]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[30]  K. K. Cetina.  Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[31]  M. Berg,et al.  Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols , 1997 .

[32]  B. Metcalfe,et al.  Project management system design: A social and organisational analysis , 1997 .

[33]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Projects as Arenas for Renewal and Learning Processes , 1998 .

[34]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Conceptualizing a Projectified Society Discussion of an Eco-Institutional Approach to a Theory on Temporary Organisations , 1998 .

[35]  J. Davidson Frame.  Project Management Competence: Building Key Skills for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations , 1999 .

[36]  Peter W. G. Morris.  What project managers need to know , 1999 .

[37]  V. Fournier.  The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism , 1999 .

[38]  Yehouda Shenhav,et al.  Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution , 1999 .

[39]  Frobisher Crescent.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992-1996 , 1999 .

[40]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study , 1999 .

[41]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Project management: a profession based on knowledge or faith? , 1999 .

[42]  Stephen Wearne,et al.  Research into revising the APM Project Management Body of Knowledge , 2000 .

[43]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  A World of Standards , 2000 .

[44]  Phil Johnson,et al.  Understanding Management Research , 2000 .

[45]  Rebecca Jones,et al.  Making Standards Work. , 2000 .

[46]  Phil Johnson,et al.  Understanding Management Research: An Introduction to Epistemology , 2000 .

[47]  Svetlana. Cicmil,et al.  Reconstructing the project management knowledge system: A multiple-perspective agenda , 2001 .

[48]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  G. Bowker,et al.  Instrumentalizing the truth of practice , 2001 .

[50]  H. Maylor.  Beyond the Gantt chart:: Project management moving on , 2001 .

[51]  D. Hodgson.  Disciplining the Professional: The Case of Project Management , 2002 .

[52]  Barbara Townley,et al.  Managing with Modernity , 2002 .

[53]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Beyond Project Management: New Perspectives on the temporary – permanent dilemma , 2002 .

[54]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[55]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Elizabeth Sheehy.  Editorial , 2003 .

[57]  J. Hassard,et al.  Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the Production of Actor-Network Accounts , 2004 .

[58]  Damian Hodgson,et al.  Knowledge, Action and Reflection in Management Education: The case of project management , 2004 .

[59]  D. Silverman.  Qualitative research : theory, method and practice , 2004 .

[60]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Political Hybrids: Tocquevillean Views on Project Organizations , 2004 .

[61]  D. Arenberg.  In search of the holy grail: lung cancer biomarkers. , 2004, Chest.

[62]  K. Vann.  On the Valorization of Informatic Labour , 2004 .

[63]  D. Kavanagh,et al.  From project ontologies to communities of virtue , 2004 .

[64]  D. Hodgson.  Project Work: The Legacy of Bureaucratic Control in the Post-Bureaucratic Organization , 2004 .

[65]  Marcelo Schneck de Paula Pessôa,et al.  Project Management Models in IT , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[66]  Joanne Roberts.  Limits to Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[67]  Johann Packendorff,et al.  What's New in New Forms of Organizing? On the Construction of Gender in Project-Based Work , 2006 .

[68]  T. Clark,et al.  Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice , 2006 .

[69]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Limits of Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[70]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Making Projects Critical , 2006 .

[71]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Sociality with Objects Social Relations in , 2009 .