A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: soft tissue profile.

INTRODUCTION The aesthetic results of implant restoration in the anterior maxilla are particularly related to the soft tissue profile. Although socket preservation techniques appear to reduce bone remodelling after tooth extraction, there is still few investigations assessing the external soft tissue profile after such procedures. The goal of this study was to describe an accurate technique to evaluate soft tissue contour changes after performing socket preservation procedures. The secondary objective was to apply the newly developed measuring method to a specific socket preservation using a "saddled" connective tissue graft combined with the insertion of slowly resorbable biomaterials into the socket. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 14 patients needing tooth replacement in the aesthetic region were included to receive a socket preservation procedure using a connective tissue graft. Impressions were taken before the tooth extraction (baseline) and at 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. The corresponding plaster casts were scanned, and the evolution of the soft tissue profile in relation to the baseline situation was assessed using imaging software. RESULTS The measuring technique allowed assessing the soft tissue profiles accurately at different levels of the alveolar process. The insertion of a saddled connective tissue appeared to compensate for the horizontal and vertical bone remodelling after a socket preservation procedure in most regions of the alveolar crest. After 12 weeks, the only significant change was located in the more cervical and central region of the alveolar process and reached a median drop of 0.62 mm from baseline. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, we found that a saddled connective tissue graft combined with a socket preservation procedure could almost completely counteract the bone remodelling in terms of the external soft tissue profile. The minor changes found in the cervical region might disappear with the emergence profile of the prosthodontic components. The described technique might therefore enhance the aesthetic outcomes when a tooth has to be replaced in the aesthetic zone. The described protocol can be used to further compare the effectiveness of different extraction socket preservation protocols in randomised controlled trials.

[1]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[2]  E. Rompen,et al.  A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  M. Wong,et al.  A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  M. Sanz,et al.  Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  D. E. Slot,et al.  Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  U. Grunder Crestal ridge width changes when placing implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months: report of 24 consecutive cases. , 2011, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[7]  A. Mehl,et al.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[8]  T. Reichert,et al.  Use of a combination epithelized-subepithelial connective tissue graft for closure and soft tissue augmentation of an extraction site following ridge preservation or implant placement: description of a technique. , 2010, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[9]  D. E. Slot,et al.  Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: a clinical and histologic study. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  F. Romano,et al.  Clinical and histologic healing of human extraction sockets filled with calcium sulfate. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  G. Cardaropoli,et al.  Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  A. Barone,et al.  Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal. A clinical and histomorphometric study. , 2008 .

[14]  R. Eber,et al.  Effects of a Putty-Form Hydroxyapatite Matrix Combined With the Synthetic Cell-Binding Peptide P-15 on Alveolar Ridge Preservation , 2008 .

[15]  Myron Nevins,et al.  A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[16]  J. Wennström,et al.  Dental Abstracts , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for extraction socket augmentation. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  T. Jemt,et al.  Measurements of soft tissue volume in association with single-implant restorations: a 1-year comparative study after abutment connection surgery. , 2004, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[19]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Measurements of buccal tissue volumes at single-implant restorations after local bone grafting in maxillas: a 3-year clinical prospective study case series. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[21]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[22]  S. von Hagen,et al.  Changes in alveolar bone height and width following post-extraction ridge augmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freeze-dried bone osteoinductive graft. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  H. Greenwell,et al.  Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[24]  T. Berglundh,et al.  Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  R. Carson,et al.  The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with collagen membrane or autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system for ridge preservation following tooth extraction. , 2003, Journal - Oklahoma Dental Association.

[26]  H. Tal,et al.  Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  E. Barboza Localized ridge maintenance using bone membrane. , 1999, Implant dentistry.

[28]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[30]  S. Studer,et al.  The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  J. Pietrokovski The bony residual ridge in man. , 1975, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.