Diagnosis and characterization of acute erythroleukemia subsets by determining the percentages of myeloblasts and proerythroblasts in 69 cases

Acute erythroleukemia (FAB M6) is a rare heterogeneous disease with an increase in red cell precursors and myeloblasts. Three subsets have been described: M6A (myeloblast‐rich erythroleukemia); M6B (proerythroblast‐rich erythroleukemia); and M6C (myeloblast‐ and proerythroblast‐rich mixed variant). This study was undertaken to define and compare the clinical courses and survival outcomes among M6A, M6B, and M6C variants of erythroleukemia. Sixty‐nine cases of M6 leukemia were categorized as consisting of ≥50% erythroid of all nucleated cells and M6A with ≥30% myeloblasts/nonerythroid component; M6B with ≥30% proerythroblasts/erythroid component; and M6C with ≥30% myeloblasts and ≥30% proerythroblasts. The demographics, cell type distribution, and survival (mean ± sd) of these groups were compared. There were 32 M6A, 26 M6B, and 11 M6C patients. No significant difference was seen among the groups in age, sex, or treatment. Compared to M6A, both the M6B (P< 0.0001) and M6C (P< 0.0001) variants showed a statistically significant increase in the percentage of bone marrow erythroid cells, proerythroblasts, and the proerythroblasts/erythroid ratios. Comparing the groups for survival, M6B (3 ± 3.6 months) versus M6A (25 ± 28 months), P< 0.002, and M6C (10 ± 13 months) versus M6A, P< 0.01 had a poorer prognosis. Calculating the proerythroblasts as a component of total bone marrow erythroids provides a complimentary method for delineating the pure red cell erythroleukemia (M6B) and mixed variant (M6C), similar to that for the myeloid/erythroid (M6A) leukemia. Now that it is possible to delineate erythroleukemia subtypes, innovative treatments are indicated to target the malignant erythroid population, which is resistant to myeloid‐based therapies. Am. J. Hematol. 65:5–13, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Hanspal,et al.  Molecular identification and functional characterization of a novel protein that mediates the attachment of erythroblasts to macrophages. , 1998, Blood.

[2]  H. Cualing,et al.  Acute erythroleukemia: evaluation of 48 cases with reference to classification, cell proliferation, cytogenetics, and prognosis. , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  H. Gralnick,et al.  Proposals for the Classification of the Acute Leukaemias French‐American‐British (FAB) Co‐operative Group , 1976, British journal of haematology.

[4]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Morphologic characteristics of erythroleukemia (Acute Myeloid Leukemia; FAB‐M6): A CALGB study , 1995, American journal of hematology.

[5]  T. Grogan Society for Hematopathology Program , 1996 .

[6]  M. Bondurant,et al.  The roles of Bcl-X(L) and apopain in the control of erythropoiesis by erythropoietin. , 1997, Blood.

[7]  A. Aventín,et al.  Acute Erythroblastic Leukemia , 1989 .

[8]  J. Cotelingam,et al.  The prognostic significance of proerythroblasts in acute erythroleukemia. , 1992, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  S. Weil,et al.  Erythroleukemia: a review of 15 cases meeting 1985 FAB criteria and survey of the literature. , 1992, Blood reviews.

[10]  Willman Cl The prognostic significance of the expression and function of multidrug resistance transporter proteins in acute myeloid leukemia: studies of the Southwest Oncology Group Leukemia Research Program. , 1997, Seminars in hematology.

[11]  S. Stass,et al.  Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase immunofluorescence of bone marrow smears: experience in 156 cases. , 1979, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  C. Civin,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of human bone marrow: I. Normal erythroid development , 1987 .

[13]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Flandrin,et al.  Minimally differentiated erythroleukaemia (AML M6 Variant'): a rare subset of AML distinct from AML M6 , 1995, British journal of haematology.

[15]  P. Thall,et al.  Effect of diagnosis (refractory anemia with excess blasts, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation, or acute myeloid leukemia [AML]) on outcome of AML-type chemotherapy. , 1997, Blood.

[16]  T. Nakahata,et al.  Cell surface antigen expression in human erythroid progenitors: erythroid and megakaryocytic markers. , 1994, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[17]  E. Jaffe Introduction to the WHO Classification , 1997 .

[18]  G Flandrin,et al.  Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  G. Dewald,et al.  The erythroid leukemias: a comparative study of erythroleukemia (FAB M6) and Di Guglielmo disease. , 1998, American journal of clinical oncology.

[20]  J. Hanspal,et al.  The association of erythroblasts with macrophages promotes erythroid proliferation and maturation: a 30-kD heparin-binding protein is involved in this contact , 1994 .

[21]  A. Pearse Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied , 1953 .

[22]  D. Malkin,et al.  Childhood erythroleukemia: review of clinical and biological features. , 1989, The American journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[23]  V. Roggli,et al.  Prognostic factors and treatment effects on survival in erythroleukemia: A retrospective study of 134 cases , 1981, Cancer.

[24]  E. Prochownik,et al.  Regulation of megakaryocyte phenotype in human erythroleukemia cells. , 1990, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  P. Cin,et al.  Morphologic, immunologic and cytogenetic studies in erythroleukaemia: evidence for multilineage involvement and identification of two distinct cytogenetic‐clihicopathological types , 1990, British journal of haematology.