Student-to-Student Interaction Revisited: A Case Study of Working Adult Business Students in Online Courses*

Faculty teaching in online environments are universally encouraged to incorporate a variety of student-to-student learning activities into their courses. Although there is a body of both theoretical and empirical work supporting this, adult professional students participating in an online MBA program at an urban business school reported being at best indifferent and often negative regarding these learning activities. A case study was performed to explore how pervasive this attitude was and the possible reasons for it. Through various sources of data and exploration, we discovered that common interactive modalities are not associated with either perceived learning or satisfaction. A content analysis of a data analysis course revealed that 64.5% of responses recalled student-to-student interactivities when responding to a “learned least from” query. We identified three possible reasons for these negative responses: time inefficiency, interaction dysfunction, and flexibility intrusion. We conclude that, although some working professional students probably do learn from student-to-student interactivity, the costs incurred may be too great. If working adult students present a different profile than those students typically represented in academic research and thus have different needs and expectations, we may need to rethink the design of online education delivered to them.

[1]  P. Whitten,et al.  Re‐thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social cognitive exploration , 2000 .

[2]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[3]  Frank A. Buckless,et al.  Cooperative learning - a literature guide , 1999 .

[4]  R. W. Haas,et al.  Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects , 1996 .

[5]  Alex Citurs,et al.  Forging into the Wired Wilderness: A Case Study of a Technology-Mediated Distributed Discussion-Based Class , 2002 .

[6]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Knowledge Building Communities: Consistency, Contact and Communication in the Virtual Classroom , 2000 .

[7]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Educational Applications of CMCS: Solving Case Studies through Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and Performance , 1997 .

[9]  Lynda R. Ross,et al.  Effects of Student Predisposing Characteristics on Student Success , 1990 .

[10]  E. Wagner.  Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[11]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Marilyn A. Dyrud,et al.  The Third Wave: A Position Paper , 2000 .

[13]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Gwo-Dong Chen,et al.  Users' attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory , 1988 .

[16]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Purchasing Education on the Internet , 1999 .

[17]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[18]  A. P. Rovai.  Building classroom community at a distance: A case study , 2001 .

[19]  S. C. Ehrmann.  IMPLEMENTING THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES: Technology as Lever , 2004 .

[20]  Holly H. Brower,et al.  On Emulating Classroom Discussion in a Distance-Delivered OBHR Course: Creating an On-Line Learning Community , 2003 .

[21]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Is There an Optimal Design for On-Line MBA Courses? , 2005 .

[23]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning , 1995, MIS Q..

[24]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Kiely,et al.  Adult learning theory and the pursuit of adult degrees , 2004 .

[26]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning , 2007 .

[27]  Joan L. Whipp,et al.  Meeting Psychological Needs in Web-based Courses for Teachers , 2000 .

[28]  S. Easton,et al.  Clarifying the Instructor's Role in Online Distance Learning , 2003 .

[29]  J. Arbaugh.  Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[30]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Computer-support for collaborative learning: learning to support student engagement , 1999 .

[31]  Rebecca Duray,et al.  Teamwork Orientation, Group Cohesiveness, and Student Learning: A Study of the Use of Teams in Online Distance Education , 2006 .

[32]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Gerald E. Evans,et al.  Graduate Business Students Performance with Synchronous and Asynchronous Interaction e-Learning Methods , 2003 .

[34]  J. Arbaugh.  How Classroom Environment and Student Engagement Affect Learning in Internet-based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[35]  S. Merriam.  Andragogy and Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory , 2001 .

[36]  Joanna Wolfe.  Gender, Ethnicity, and Classroom Discourse , 2000 .

[37]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[38]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[39]  Sigfredo A. Hernandez.  Team Learning in a Marketing Principles Course: Cooperative Structures That Facilitate Active Learning and Higher Level Thinking , 2002 .

[40]  Dawn M. Poole.  Student Participation in a Discussion-Oriented Online Course , 2000 .

[41]  J. Arbaugh,et al.  A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning , 2005 .

[42]  Michael F. Beaudoin.  Learning or lurking?: Tracking the "invisible" online student , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  K. Card,et al.  Providing Access to Graduate Education Using Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2000 .

[44]  Heidi Perreault,et al.  Impact of Information Technologies on Faculty and Students in Distance Education. , 2003 .

[45]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[46]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[47]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-Based MBA Course , 2000 .

[48]  Dave S. Knowlton.  Promoting Durable Knowledge Construction through Online Discussion , 2002 .