The effects of visual information in eWOM communication

Purpose – Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) is a considerably influential factor for consumers to search for product information. Nowadays, consumers can easily post visual information (e.g. pictures or videos) to convey product information and consumption‐related experiences. Yet, prior eWOM studies focused primarily on the verbal information of eWOM. Few studies have paid sufficient attention to the effects of visual information in eWOM communication. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to employ blogs to investigate the effects of visual information on consumers' perception of eWOM message quality, credibility, product interest, and purchase intention.Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted two empirical studies in the field of different product categories. Data were collected from subjects ranged in age from 16 to 50 (n=155 for study 1, n=309 for study 2), and analyzed using independent‐samples t test and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).Findings – Results show that subjects rate...

[1]  S. Sundar,et al.  Effect of Source Attribution on Perception of Online News Stories , 1998 .

[2]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Guest editorial: Experiments in e‐commerce , 2005 .

[3]  M. Slater,et al.  How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change , 1996 .

[4]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments , 1984 .

[5]  Dan Hill,et al.  Tell me no lies: Using science to connect with consumers , 2003 .

[6]  P. Luarn,et al.  Effect of Internet Book Reviews on Purchase intention: A Focus Group Study , 2005 .

[7]  M. Strahilevitz,et al.  Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell , 1998 .

[8]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[9]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative Versus Noncomparative Advertis-ing: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[11]  Peyton Glore,et al.  The Impact of Design and Aesthetics on Usability, Credibility, and Learning in an Online Environment. , 2010 .

[12]  Yu-shan Lin,et al.  Internet blogs as a tourism marketing medium: A case study , 2006, Journal of Business Research.

[13]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing , 1997 .

[14]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Pavlovian Processes in Consumer Choice: The Physical Presence of a Good Increases Willingness-to-Pay , 2010 .

[15]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Measuring the Concept of Credibility , 1986 .

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices , 2002 .

[17]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making , 2007 .

[18]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[19]  L. Stoel,et al.  On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention , 2005 .

[20]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[21]  M. DeLong,et al.  Apparel Shopping on the Web , 1999 .

[22]  D. R. Danielson,et al.  How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants , 2003, DUX '03.

[23]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[24]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects between On-Air and Online News , 2003 .

[25]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation Systems: Facilitating Trust in Internet Interactions , 2000 .

[26]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentations , 1981 .

[27]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[28]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Measuring and Managing Interactive Environments , 2009 .

[29]  Sharron J. Lennon,et al.  The perceptual fluency effect on pleasurable online shopping experience , 2010 .

[30]  Nada Nasr Bechwati,et al.  Word of Mouse , 2008 .

[31]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[32]  F. Brunel,et al.  Uncovering Rhetorical Methods of Word-Of-Mouth Talk in an Online Community , 2006 .

[33]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[34]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[35]  Ainsworth Bailey,et al.  Consumer Awareness and Use of Product Review Websites , 2005 .

[36]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information , 2001 .

[37]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[38]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[39]  S. Lennon,et al.  The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping , 2008 .

[40]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An examination of the influences of store layout in online retailing , 2005 .