The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Abstract : The results of observational studies are often disputed because of nonrandom treatment assignment. For example, patients at greater risk may be overrepresented in some treatment group. This paper discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies. The propensity score is the (estimated) conditional probability of assignment to a particular treatment given a vector of observed covariates. Both large and small sample theory show that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates. Applications include: matched sampling on the univariate propensity score which is equal percent bias reducing under more general conditions than required for discriminant matching, multivariate adjustment by subclassification on balancing scores where the same subclasses are used to estimate treatment effects for all outcome variables and in all subpopulations, and visual representation of multivariate adjustment by a two-dimensional plot. (Author)

[1]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[2]  Oscar Kempthorne The design and analysis of experiments. , 1952 .

[3]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[4]  I NICOLETTI,et al.  The Planning of Experiments , 1936, Rivista di clinica pediatrica.

[5]  David R. Cox Planning of Experiments , 1958 .

[6]  W. G. Cochran The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations , 1965 .

[7]  G. W. Snedecor STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[8]  W. G. Cochran The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. , 1968, Biometrics.

[9]  Michail Prodan,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – THE PLANNING OF EXPERIMENTS , 1968 .

[10]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[11]  A. Dempster An overview of multivariate data analysis , 1971 .

[12]  D. Cox The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data , 1972 .

[13]  D. Rubin Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[14]  D. Rubin Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[15]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[16]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing , 1974 .

[17]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. , 1974 .

[18]  Beat Kleiner,et al.  A Graphical Technique for Enhancing Scatterplots with Moving Statistics , 1975 .

[19]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing , 1974 .

[20]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Stratification by a multivariate confounder score. , 1976, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  D. Rubin ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUP ON THE BASIS OF A COVARIATE , 1976 .

[22]  A P Dawid,et al.  Properties of diagnostic data distributions. , 1976, Biometrics.

[23]  D. Rubin Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate , 1976 .

[24]  D. Rubin BIAS REDUCTION USING MAHALANOBIS METRIC MATCHING , 1978 .

[25]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[26]  Choosing the parameter for a 2 x 2 table or a 2 x 2 x 2 table analysis. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.

[27]  R. Horwitz The planning of observational studies of human populations , 1979 .

[28]  A. Dawid Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies , 1978 .

[30]  Statistical methods , 1980 .

[31]  D. Rubin Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis-Metric Matching , 1980 .

[32]  D. Cox,et al.  Theory and General Principle in Statistics , 1981 .

[33]  R. Rosati,et al.  Prognostic importance of anginal symptoms in angiographically defined coronary artery disease. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.