Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material

An African Grey parrot, previously taught to use vocal English labels to discriminate more than 80 different objects and to respond to questions concerning categorical concepts of color and shape, was trained and tested on relational concepts ofsame anddifferent. The subject, Alex, replied with the correct English categorical label (“color,” “shape,” or “mah-mah” [matter]) when asked “What’s same?” or “What’s different?” about pairs of objects that varied with respect to any combination of attributes. His accuracy was 69.7%–76.6% for pairs of familiar objects not used in training and 82.3%–85% for pairs involving objects whose combinations of colors, shapes, and materials were unfamiliar. Additional trials demonstrated that his responses were based upon the question being posed as well as the attributes of the objects. These findings are discussed in terms of his comprehension of the categories of color, shape, and material and as evidence of his competence in an exceptional (non-species-specific) communication code.

[1]  D M Rumbaugh,et al.  The capacity of animals to acquire language: do species differences have anything to say to us? , 1985, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  Thomas R. Zentall,et al.  Abstract concept learning in the pigeon. , 1974 .

[3]  Irene M. Pepperberg,et al.  Cognition in the African Grey parrot: Preliminary evidence for auditory/vocal comprehension of the class concept , 1983 .

[4]  E. Menzel,et al.  Social foraging in marmoset monkeys and the question of intelligence , 1985 .

[5]  A A Wright,et al.  Pigeon memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Social Learning of Vocal Patterns and Modes of their Application in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus)1,2,3 , 1975 .

[7]  O. Mowrer.  Learning theory and the symbolic processes. , 1962 .

[8]  M. Marschark.  A code by any other name … , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  J. Falls.  Song matching in western meadowlarks , 1985 .

[10]  Irene M. Pepperberg,et al.  Object permanence in the African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) , 1986 .

[11]  E. Macphail.  Vertebrate intelligence: the null hypothesis , 1985 .

[12]  R. Dooling,et al.  Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 1985, Journal of comparative psychology.

[13]  The Pigeon Parlance Project , 1983, VB news.

[14]  P. Stoddard,et al.  RECOGNITION OF PARENTS' VOICES BY YOUNG CLIFF SWALLOWS , 1985 .

[15]  D. Kroodsma.  Vocal Dueling among Male Marsh Wrens: Evidence for Ritualized Expressions of Dominance/Subordinance , 1979 .

[16]  E. Menzel,et al.  Marmosets (Saguinus fuscicollis): Are Learning Sets Learned? , 1982, Science.

[17]  R. K. Thomas.  Evolution of Intelligence: an Approach to Its Assessment , 1980 .

[18]  C. C. Spiker.  Experiments with children on the hypotheses of acquired distinctiveness and equivalence of cues. , 1956, Child development.

[19]  S F Sands,et al.  Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  H. W. Reese,et al.  Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence of cues in young children , 1972 .

[21]  W. Sailor,et al.  A Comparison of Three Strategies of Reinforcement on Two-Choice Learning Problems with Severely Retarded Children , 1979 .

[22]  Charles A. Edwards,et al.  Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons. , 1981 .

[23]  I. Pepperberg.  An interactive modeling technique for acquisition of communication skills: Separation of “labeling” and “requesting” in a psittacine subject , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  R. Putney.  Do Willful Apes Know What They Are Aiming At? , 1985 .

[25]  David Premack,et al.  Intelligence In Ape And Man , 1976 .

[26]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Song matching in the great tit (Parus major): The effect of similarity and familiarity , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  G. Peterson,et al.  Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.

[28]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds (Mimus, Molothrus, and Sturnus). , 1985 .

[29]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  Language Relevant Object- and Color-Naming Tasks , 1977 .

[30]  T. Zentall,et al.  “Same/different” symbol use by pigeons , 1983 .

[31]  Hank Davis,et al.  Discrimination of the number three by a raccoon (Procyon lotor) , 1984 .

[32]  I. Pepperberg.  Social Modeling Theory: A Possible Framework for Understanding Avian Vocal Learning , 1985 .

[33]  J. Krebs,et al.  Discrimination of song types by male great tits , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[34]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.