FAST TRACK PAPER: Tide model errors and GRACE gravimetry: towards a more realistic assessment

SUMMARY The manner in which errors in tide models affect monthly gravity solutions from GRACE satellite data is re-examined. We perform a complete simulation of GRACE gravity estimation, including allowance for accelerometer calibrations and satellite state-vector adjustment. Errors in monthly geoid estimates are for most regions of a order of 0.5 mm, or roughly 1 cm of equivalent water height when smoothed over radii of 600 km. In polar regions where ocean tide models are suspect, errors can grow significantly larger: over 2 mm in geoid height, although over very localized regions. Errors from diurnal tides tend to cancel, but they are not completely eliminated, inducing geoid errors of the order of 0.3 mm. The currently accepted GRACE total error budget is roughly an order of magnitude larger than the component arising from tide modelling errors.

[1]  C. Shum,et al.  Time‐variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field , 2004 .

[2]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter‐satellite range‐rate data alone , 2006 .

[3]  Victor Zlotnicki,et al.  Time‐variable gravity from GRACE: First results , 2004 .

[4]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  Error spectrum for the global M2 ocean tide , 2001 .

[5]  Aliasing and Polar Gap Effects on Geopotential Coefficient Estimation: Space-wise Simulation Study of GOCE and GRACE , 2002 .

[6]  Tidal Models in a New Era of Satellite Gravimetry , 2003 .

[7]  A. Bennett,et al.  TOPEX/POSEIDON tides estimated using a global inverse model , 1994 .

[8]  C. Shum,et al.  GRACE observations of M2 and S2 ocean tides underneath the Filchner‐Ronne and Larsen ice shelves, Antarctica , 2005 .

[9]  E. Möbius,et al.  Charge states of energetic (≈0.5 MeV/n) ions in corotating interaction regions at 1 AU and implications on source populations , 2002 .

[10]  Minkang Cheng,et al.  Gravitational perturbation theory for intersatellite tracking , 2002 .

[11]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[12]  P. Visser.  Low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking: a comparison between analytical linear orbit perturbation theory and numerical integration , 2005 .

[13]  Ernst J. O. Schrama,et al.  A preliminary tidal analysis of TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry , 1994 .

[14]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Short-arc analysis of intersatellite tracking data in a gravity mapping mission , 2002 .

[15]  U. Meyer,et al.  An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S , 2005 .

[16]  C. Jekeli.  Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[17]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[18]  G. Egbert,et al.  Efficient Inverse Modeling of Barotropic Ocean Tides , 2002 .

[19]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[20]  O. Andersen,et al.  Correcting GRACE gravity fields for ocean tide effects , 2002 .