Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has introduced a new and unique set of psychomotor skills for a surgeon to acquire and master. Although assessment technologies have been proposed, precise and objective psychomotor skills assessment of surgeons performing laparoscopic procedures has not been detailed. STUDY DESIGN Two hundred ten surgeons attending the 2001 annual meeting of the American College of Surgeons in New Orleans who reported having completed more than 50 laparoscopic procedures participated. Subjects were required to complete one box-trainer laparoscopic cutting task and a similar virtual reality task. These tasks were specifically designed to test only psychomotor and not cognitive skills. Both tasks were completed twice. Performance of tasks was assessed and analyzed. Demographic and laparoscopic experience data were also collected. RESULTS Complete data were available on 195 surgeons. In this group, surgeons performed the box-trainer task better with their dominant hand (p < 0.0001) and there was a strong and statistically significant correlation between trials (r = 0.47 - 0.64, p < 0.0001). After transforming raw data to z-scores (mean = 0 and SD = 1) it was shown that between 2% and 12% of surgeons performed more than two standard deviations from the mean. Some surgeons' performance was 20 standard deviations from the mean. Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Reality metrics demonstrated high measurement consistency as assessed by coefficient alpha (alpha = 0.849). CONCLUSIONS Objective assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills is now possible. Surgeons who had performed more than 50 laparoscopic procedures showed considerable variability in their performance on a simple laparoscopic and virtual reality task. Approximately 10% of surgeons tested performed the task significantly worse than the group's average performance. Studies such as this may form the methodology for establishing criteria levels and performance objectives in objective assessment of the technical skills component of determining surgical competence.

[1]  A. Darzi,et al.  Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[3]  A. Cuschieri Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[4]  C. D. Smith,et al.  A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. , 1999, Endoscopy.

[6]  C. Daniel Smith,et al.  Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Results of a National Survey , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[7]  J. Rosser,et al.  Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[8]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  A case-control comparison of traditional and virtual-reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor performance , 2000 .

[10]  M. Legrand,et al.  The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[12]  C D Smith,et al.  Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[13]  A. Gallagher,et al.  A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Visual depth perception in minimally invasive surgery , 1995 .

[15]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Objective Psychomotor Skills Assessment of Experienced, Junior, and Novice Laparoscopists with Virtual Reality , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[16]  L W Way,et al.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1992 .

[17]  C. Bennett,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1995 .

[18]  C G Rob,et al.  An External Audit of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed in Medical Treatment Facilities of the Department of Defense , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[19]  A. Cuschieri Visual Displays and Visual Perception in Minimal Access Surgery , 1995, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.