What does optimization theory actually predict about crown profiles of photosynthetic capacity when models incorporate greater realism?

Measured profiles of photosynthetic capacity in plant crowns typically do not match those of average irradiance: the ratio of capacity to irradiance decreases as irradiance increases. This differs from optimal profiles inferred from simple models. To determine whether this could be explained by omission of physiological or physical details from such models, we performed a series of thought experiments using a new model that included more realism than previous models. We used ray-tracing to simulate irradiance for 8000 leaves in a horizontally uniform canopy. For a subsample of 500 leaves, we simultaneously optimized both nitrogen allocation (among pools representing carboxylation, electron transport and light capture) and stomatal conductance using a transdermally explicit photosynthesis model. Few model features caused the capacity/irradiance ratio to vary systematically with irradiance. However, when leaf absorptance varied as needed to optimize distribution of light-capture N, the capacity/irradiance ratio increased up through the crown - that is, opposite to the observed pattern. This tendency was counteracted by constraints on stomatal or mesophyll conductance, which caused chloroplastic CO(2) concentration to decline systematically with increasing irradiance. Our results suggest that height-related constraints on stomatal conductance can help to reconcile observations with the hypothesis that photosynthetic N is allocated optimally.

[1]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[2]  T. Pons,et al.  Nitrogen reallocation and photosynthetic acclimation in response to partial shading in soybean plants , 1994 .

[3]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  A model of the acclimation of photosynthesis in the leaves of C3 plants to sun and shade with respect to nitrogen use , 1995 .

[4]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[5]  John R. Evans,et al.  The kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in vivo inferred from measurements of photosynthesis in leaves of transgenic tobacco , 1994, Planta.

[6]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Models of Integrated Photosynthesis of Cells and Leaves , 1989 .

[7]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination and nitrogen nutrition of trees along a rainfall gradient in northern Australia , 1998 .

[8]  P. Franks,et al.  Stomatal control and hydraulic conductance, with special reference to tall trees. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[9]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[10]  F. Schieving,et al.  Carbon gain in a multispecies canopy: the role of specific leaf area and photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency in the tragedy of the commons , 1999 .

[11]  M. Werger,et al.  Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy , 1987, Oecologia.

[12]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Spatial distribution of leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity within the foliage of individual trees: disentangling the effects of local light quality, leaf irradiance, and transpiration. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[13]  H. Mooney,et al.  Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens , 1983, Oecologia.

[14]  M. Peltoniemi,et al.  Co-optimal distribution of leaf nitrogen and hydraulic conductance in plant canopies. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[15]  William E. Winner,et al.  Foliage physiology and biochemistry in response to light gradients in conifers with varying shade tolerance , 1999, Oecologia.

[16]  G. Farquhar,et al.  A new analytical model for whole‐leaf potential electron transport rate , 2004 .

[17]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis , 1995 .

[18]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Stomatal regulation and water economy in crassulacean acid metabolism plants: an optimization model , 1982 .

[19]  E. Schulze,et al.  Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration : scaling from leaves to canopies , 1995 .

[20]  I. R. Cowan.  Stomatal Behaviour and Environment , 1978 .

[21]  J. R. Evans.  Photosynthetic acclimation and nitrogen partitioning within a lucerne canopy. II: Stability through time and comparison with a theoretical optimum , 1993 .

[22]  M. Werger,et al.  Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen partitioning among species in the canopy of a herbaceous plant community , 1994, Oecologia.

[23]  F. Badeck.  Intra-leaf gradient of assimilation rate and optimal allocation of canopy nitrogen : a model on the implications of the use of homogeneous assimilation functions , 1995 .

[24]  John R. Evans,et al.  Partitioning of Nitrogen Between and Within Leaves Grown Under Different Irradiances , 1989 .

[25]  D. Roberts,et al.  How should leaf area, sapwood area and stomatal conductance vary with tree height to maximize growth? , 2006, Tree physiology.

[26]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Leaf internal diffusion conductance limits photosynthesis more strongly in older leaves of Mediterranean evergreen broad‐leaved species , 2005 .

[27]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  An Empirical Model of Stomatal Conductance , 1984 .

[28]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants , 1996 .

[29]  A. Baille,et al.  Changes in leaf photosynthetic parameters with leaf position and nitrogen content within a rose plant canopy (Rosa hybrida). , 2000 .

[30]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Evidence of Reduced Photosynthetic Rates in Old Trees , 1994, Forest Science.

[31]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  SUNFLECKS AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PLANT CANOPIES , 1990 .

[32]  Olevi Kull,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis in canopies: models and limitations , 2002, Oecologia.

[33]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[34]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Spatial distribution of leaf water‐use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination within an isolated tree crown , 2001 .

[35]  D. Hollinger.  Optimality and nitrogen allocation in a tree canopy. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[36]  Tania June,et al.  A simple new equation for the reversible temperature dependence of photosynthetic electron transport: a study on soybean leaf. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[37]  I. Terashima,et al.  Effects of Light and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Organization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Spinach , 1988 .

[38]  J. Evans.  The relationship between electron transport components and photosynthetic capacity in pea leaves grown at different irradiances , 1987 .

[39]  Jaume Flexas,et al.  Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[40]  C. Warren.  Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[41]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[42]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Transpiration and whole-tree conductance in ponderosa pine trees of different heights , 2000, Oecologia.

[43]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Self-shading, Carbon Gain and Leaf Dynamics: a Test of Alternative Optimality Models , 1998 .

[44]  M. Adams,et al.  Internal conductance does not scale with photosynthetic capacity: implications for carbon isotope discrimination and the economics of water and nitrogen use in photosynthesis. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[45]  J. Haefner,et al.  A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity , 1997 .

[46]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Complex adjustments of photosynthetic potentials and internal diffusion conductance to current and previous light availabilities and leaf age in Mediterranean evergreen species Quercus ilex. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[47]  W. Brand,et al.  Optimisation of photosynthetic carbon gain and within-canopy gradients of associated foliar traits for Amazon forest trees , 2010 .

[48]  A. Friend,et al.  Modelling canopy CO2 fluxes: are ‘big‐leaf’ simplifications justified? , 2001 .

[49]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the limits to tree height using statistical regressions of leaf traits. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[50]  M. Peisker.  CO2-Aufnahme, Transpiration und Blattemperatur unter dem Einfluß von Änderungen der Stomataweite , 1973, Die Kulturpflanze.

[51]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  Comparative photosynthetic properties of palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts of Camellia japonica L.: functional adjustment of the photosynthetic apparatus to light environment within a leaf , 1984 .

[52]  P. Sands.  Modelling Canopy Production. I. Optimal Distribution of Photosynthetic Resources , 1995 .

[53]  Kathryn E. Parker,et al.  Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[54]  F. W. Wiegel,et al.  Optimizing the Canopy Photosynthetic Rate by Patterns of Investment in Specific Leaf Mass , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[55]  A. Makino,et al.  Leaf photosynthesis, plant growth and nitrogen allocation in rice under different irradiances , 1997, Planta.

[56]  J. Amthor.  Scaling CO2-photosynthesis relationships from the leaf to the canopy , 1994, Photosynthesis Research.

[57]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination by a sequence of Eucalyptus species along a subcontinental rainfall gradient in Australia , 2001 .

[58]  George W. Koch,et al.  The limits to tree height , 2004, Nature.

[59]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[60]  B. Kruijt,et al.  Leaf photosynthetic light response : a mechanistic model for scaling photosynthesis to leaves and canopies , 1998 .

[61]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Optimal stomatal control in relation to leaf area and nitrogen content , 2002 .

[62]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .

[63]  U. Niinemets.  Optimization of foliage photosynthetic capacity in tree canopies: towards identifying missing constraints. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[64]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis , 2001 .

[65]  R. Dewar,et al.  Hydraulic responses to height growth in maritime pine trees , 2004 .

[66]  S. Linder,et al.  Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[67]  G. Farquhar,et al.  The mathematics of linked optimisation for water and nitrogen use in a canopy , 2002 .

[68]  C. Field,et al.  Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: Leaf age as a control on the allocation program , 1983, Oecologia.

[69]  J. Flexas,et al.  Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. , 2012, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[70]  Michael L. Roderick,et al.  Estimating the diffuse component from daily and monthly measurements of global radiation , 1999 .

[71]  Nathan Phillips,et al.  Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit , 1999 .

[72]  E. Ögren,et al.  Photosynthetic light-response curves , 1993, Planta.