Developing a realistic sexual network model of chlamydia transmission in Britain

BackgroundA national chlamydia screening programme is currently being rolled out in the UK and other countries. However, much of the epidemiology remains poorly understood. In this paper we present a stochastic, individual based, dynamic sexual network model of chlamydia transmission and its parameterisation. Mathematical models provide a theoretical framework for understanding the key epidemiological features of chlamydia: sexual behaviour, health care seeking and transmission dynamics.ResultsThe model parameters were estimated either directly or by systematic fitting to a variety of appropriate data sources. The fitted model was representative of sexual behaviour, chlamydia epidemiology and health care use in England. We were able to recapture the observed age distribution of chlamydia prevalence.ConclusionEstimating parameters for models of sexual behaviour and transmission of chlamydia is complex. Most of the parameter values are highly correlated, highly variable and there is little empirical evidence to inform estimates. We used a novel approach to estimate the rate of active treatment seeking, by combining data sources, which improved the credibility of the model results. The model structure is flexible and is broadly applicable to other developed world settings and provides a practical tool for public health decision makers.

[1]  W. Cates,et al.  Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  C. Carlisle,et al.  Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: Acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[3]  K. Fenton,et al.  Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[4]  R. Ness,et al.  Systematic Review: Noninvasive Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  A. Ghani,et al.  The Role of Sexual Partnership Networks in the Epidemiology of Gonorrhea , 1997, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Ethnic variations in sexual behaviour in Great Britain and risk of sexually transmitted infections: a probability survey , 2005, The Lancet.

[7]  Wendy Macdowall,et al.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection , 2001, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Anderson,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases and sexual behavior: insights from mathematical models. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  M. Golden,et al.  Duration of Untreated Genital Infections With Chlamydia trachomatis: A Review of the Literature , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[12]  T. Moss.  International Handbook of Chlamydia , 2001 .

[13]  W. Stamm,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections: progress and problems. , 1999, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[14]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment , 2001, AIDS.

[15]  K. Holmes,et al.  Comparative Epidemiology of Heterosexual Gonococcal and Chlamydial Networks: Implications for Transmission Patterns , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[16]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  T. W. Smith,et al.  Discrepancies between men and women in reporting number of sexual partners: a summary from four countries. , 1992, Social biology.

[18]  A. Ghani,et al.  Sampling biases and missing data in explorations of sexual partner networks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  J. Lindbäck,et al.  Is the Increase in Notifications of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Sweden the Result of Changes in Prevalence, Sampling Frequency or Diagnostic Methods? , 2002, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  A. Davies,et al.  Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16–24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group , 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[21]  C. Hoebe,et al.  Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands , 2005, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[22]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[23]  N. Low,et al.  The correct approach to modelling and evaluating chlamydia screening , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[24]  William C Miller,et al.  Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. , 2004, JAMA.

[25]  K. Wellings,et al.  What's in a Mean? -an Examination of the Inconsistency between Men and Women in Reporting Sexual Partnerships , 1996 .

[26]  G. Vanzetto,et al.  [Therapeutic management]. , 2000, Nephrologie.

[27]  Michele G. Alexander,et al.  Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality , 2003, Journal of sex research.

[28]  S. Gupta,et al.  The significance of sexual partner contact networks for the transmission dynamics of HIV. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[29]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[30]  S Q Muth,et al.  Prostitution and the sex discrepancy in reported number of sexual partners. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Sterne,et al.  Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  N. Muñoz,et al.  Prevalence and determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women from Bogota, Colombia. , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[33]  Ronald H Gray,et al.  What proportion of episodes of gonorrhoea and chlamydia becomes symptomatic? , 2002, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[34]  M. Morris,et al.  Telling tails explain the discrepancy in sexual partner reports , 1993, Nature.