Determination of Cardiac Output With Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography: A Validation Study

Objective:To validate and to determine the reproducibility of cardiac output (CO) measurements based on a test-bolus examination in multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in comparison with invasively measured CO using the thermal dilution technique. Material and Methods:In 8 swine, CO was determined by invasive thermal dilution technique and by analysis of enhancement data from dynamic MSCT test-bolus examinations. To assess reproducibility, all MSCT examinations were performed twice. Results were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. Results:Measure by thermal dilution technique CO was 3.71 ± 1.12 L/min, whereas CO was 3.67 ± 1.30 L/min using MSCT. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.89. The average deviation between MSCT and thermal dilution technique was 0.04 L/min with a standard deviation of 0.59 L/min. There was a good agreement between both MSCT measurements with a mean deviation of −0.03 L/min and a standard deviation of 0.51 L/min. Conclusion:CO can reliably be determined from MSCT by means of indicator dilution technique. Measurements are reproducible and provide valuable information on the overall cardiovascular performance without application of additional contrast material or radiation. As this technique does not require time-consuming postprocessing it can be added to routine reporting.

[1]  A. Coats,et al.  Measurement accuracy of cardiac output in humans: indicator-dilution technique versus geometric analysis by ultrafast computed tomography. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  Pedro A. Lemos,et al.  Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  C. Starmer,et al.  Indicator Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate , 1964, Circulation research.

[5]  Ernst Klotz,et al.  Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.

[6]  P. Marik Pulmonary artery catheterization and esophageal doppler monitoring in the ICU. , 1999, Chest.

[7]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Measurement of Cardiac Output by Computed Transmission Tomography , 1982, Investigative radiology.

[8]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[9]  W Jaschke,et al.  Measurement of cardiac output by cine computed tomography. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  B H Brundage,et al.  Determination of cardiac output by ultrafast computed tomography. , 1986, American journal of physiologic imaging.

[11]  Biphasic and discontinuous injection of contrast material for thin-section helical ct angiography of the whole aorta and iliac arteries. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S Dohi,et al.  Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution , 1993, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[13]  G D Rubin,et al.  Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[14]  E. Lobato,et al.  Advances in noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: an update. , 2001, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[15]  J. Willmann,et al.  Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, Radiology.