A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments

AbstractIsobaric labeling is a powerful strategy for quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic investigations. A complication of such analyses has been the co-isolation of multiple analytes of similar mass-to-charge resulting in the distortion of relative protein abundance measurements across samples. When properly implemented, synchronous precursor selection and triple-stage mass spectrometry (SPS-MS3) can reduce the occurrence of this phenomenon, referred to as ion interference. However, no diagnostic tool is available currently to rapidly and accurately assess ion interference. To address this need, we developed a multiplexed tandem mass tag (TMT)-based standard, termed the triple knockout (TKO). This standard is comprised of three yeast proteomes in triplicate, each from a strain deficient in a highly abundant protein (Met6, Pfk2, or Ura2). The relative abundance patterns of these proteins, which can be inferred from dozens of peptide measurements can demonstrate ion interference in peptide quantification. We expect no signal in channels where the protein is knocked out, permitting maximum sensitivity for measurements of ion interference against a null background. Here, we emphasize the need to investigate further ion interference-generated ratio distortion and promote the TKO standard as a tool to investigate such issues. Graphical Abstractᅟ

[1]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Global Analysis of Protein Expression and Phosphorylation Levels in Nicotine-Treated Pancreatic Stellate Cells. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[3]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  High-throughput creation of a whole-genome collection of yeast knockout strains. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[4]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  S. Gygi,et al.  A comprehensive proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of yeast deletion mutants of 14‐3‐3 orthologs and associated effects of rapamycin , 2015, Proteomics.

[6]  P. Maitra,et al.  Multiple genes control particulate phosphofructokinase of yeast , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[7]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  A Tissue-Specific Atlas of Mouse Protein Phosphorylation and Expression , 2010, Cell.

[8]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  MultiNotch MS3 Enables Accurate, Sensitive, and Multiplexed Detection of Differential Expression across Cancer Cell Line Proteomes , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Visualizing samples with box plots. , 2014, Nature methods.

[10]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.

[12]  H. Robichon-Szulmajster,et al.  Methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1975, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[13]  Yolanda T. Chong,et al.  Yeast Proteome Dynamics from Single Cell Imaging and Automated Analysis , 2015, Cell.

[14]  F. Lacroute Regulation of Pyrimidine Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1968, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Alexander S. Banks,et al.  Effects of MEK inhibitors GSK1120212 and PD0325901 in vivo using 10‐plex quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics , 2015, Proteomics.

[16]  So Young Ryu,et al.  Bioinformatics tools to identify and quantify proteins using mass spectrometry data. , 2014, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[17]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Points of Significance: Visualizing samples with box plots , 2014, Nature Methods.

[18]  S. Gygi,et al.  ms3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative , 2011 .

[19]  O. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos,et al.  A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Jeremy D O'Connell,et al.  Proteome-wide quantitative multiplexed profiling of protein expression: carbon-source dependency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  Joshua E. Elias,et al.  Target-Decoy Search Strategy for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics , 2010, Proteome Bioinformatics.

[22]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.