Observing the PSASB: ED 50 and the Recognition of Infrastructure Assets

Provisions of AAS 27 significantly expanding the recognition of assets in local government financial statements have proven to be controversial, particularly through their application to items of infrastructure. In one instance, state legislation was amended to overrule the standard. More recently, the standard itself has been amended to extend the relevant transitional provisions. To assist in explaining why an accounting issue ostensibly resolved through the due process of standard-setting continues to generate controversy, the responses to the exposure draft (ED 50) that preceded the standard were reviewed and analysed. This led to the conclusion that any inference that respondents to ED 50 generally supported the proposals relating to accounting for infrastructure items is, at best, problematic. This paper provides insights to standard-setting processes, particularly the workings of the Public Sector Accounting Standards Board and the extent of its responsiveness to parties affected by its deliberations.

[1]  G. Carnegie,et al.  Enabling Accountability in Museums , 1996 .

[2]  Tom Mouck,et al.  Objectivity and the role of history in the development and review of accounting standards , 1996 .

[3]  R. Burritt,et al.  What Is A Public-Sector Asset? , 1996 .

[4]  G. Carnegie,et al.  The Financial Value Of Cultural, Heritage And Scientific Collections: An Accounting Fiction , 1995 .

[5]  P. Young Market Valuation with No Market – Valuing Properties with Little Evidence , 1994 .

[6]  W. Chua,et al.  INTERESTS AND THE PROFESSION-STATE DYNAMIC: EXPLAINING THE EMERGENCE OF THE AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD , 1994 .

[7]  I. Tutticci,et al.  Respondent Lobbying in the Australian Accounting Standard‐setting Process: ED49 – A Case Study , 1994 .

[8]  H. Falk,et al.  Financial Reporting BY Local Government And The Disproportionate Requirements Of AAS 27 , 1993 .

[9]  T. Rowles Comment: In Defence Of AAS 27 , 1993 .

[10]  Malcolm C. Miller,et al.  SAG 4 And The Challenge To The Mandatory Status Of Concepts Statements , 1993 .

[11]  Peter Robinson,et al.  A Critical Assessment of the Literature on Political Activity and Accounting Regulation , 1993 .

[12]  C. Deegan,et al.  Audit Firm Lobbying on Proposed Disclosure Requirements , 1990 .

[13]  Peter Booth,et al.  CRITICAL RESEARCH ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD SETTING , 1990 .

[14]  R. Gibson,et al.  COMPANY PARTICIPATION IN THE AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS , 1989 .

[15]  John B. MacArthur An Analysis of the Content of Corporate Submissions on Proposed Accounting Standards in the UK , 1988 .

[16]  R. Walker Australia's ASRB. A Case Study of Political Activity and Regulatory ‘Capture’ , 1987 .

[17]  Donald J. Stokes,et al.  Standard-Setters' Responsiveness to Submissions on Exposure Drafts: Australian Evidence , 1985 .

[18]  R. Gray,et al.  POWER AND POLICY MAKING: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN R & D STANDARD , 1982 .

[19]  Robert R. Sterling,et al.  Toward a Science of Accounting , 1980, The Quest for a Science of Accounting.