Hemagglutinin Receptor Binding Avidity Drives Influenza A Virus Antigenic Drift

Flu's Tricky Tricks After vaccination against influenza A virus, single-point mutations are selected in hemagglutinin (the virus molecule that binds to sialic acid molecules on the surface of host cells) that escape neutralization by polyclonal antibody responses. Hensley et al. (p. 734) have discovered that in mice these mutations increased the virus's avidity for sialic acid. Amino acid substitutions that occur during reiterations of immune escape and avidity modulation can thus drive antigenic variation. This constant evolution of influenza viruses requires us to change vaccine components annually, and, for equine influenza, Park et al. (p. 726) show that as the match between virus and vaccine strains drifts apart with time, the probability of becoming infected and the length of the infectious period increase to the point where outbreaks occur. Nevertheless, even imperfect vaccines may be of benefit to a population because increasing the proportion of vaccinated individuals can supply enough herd immunity to offset a poor antigenic match, especially if used in conjunction with antiviral drugs. For humans, Yang et al. (p. 729, published online 10 September) estimate that the rate of transmission within U.S. households puts influenza A 2009 H1N1 (the current pandemic “swine flu”) in the higher range of transmissibility, compared to past seasonal and pandemic strains. Thus, to achieve mitigation this fall, children should be the first recipients of vaccine, followed by adults—aiming overall for 70% coverage of the population. Viruses escape antibody responses by changing surface protein structures to increase the strength of binding to host cells. Rapid antigenic evolution in the influenza A virus hemagglutinin precludes effective vaccination with existing vaccines. To understand this phenomenon, we passaged virus in mice immunized with influenza vaccine. Neutralizing antibodies selected mutants with single–amino acid hemagglutinin substitutions that increased virus binding to cell surface glycan receptors. Passaging these high-avidity binding mutants in naïve mice, but not immune mice, selected for additional hemagglutinin substitutions that decreased cellular receptor binding avidity. Analyzing a panel of monoclonal antibody hemagglutinin escape mutants revealed a positive correlation between receptor binding avidity and escape from polyclonal antibodies. We propose that in response to variation in neutralizing antibody pressure between individuals, influenza A virus evolves by adjusting receptor binding avidity via amino acid substitutions throughout the hemagglutinin globular domain, many of which simultaneously alter antigenicity.

[1]  J. Skehel,et al.  Comparative analyses of the specificities of anti-influenza hemagglutinin antibodies in human sera , 1986, Journal of virology.

[2]  I. Wilson,et al.  Structural basis of immune recognition of influenza virus hemagglutinin. , 1990, Annual review of immunology.

[3]  Hong Jin,et al.  Two residues in the hemagglutinin of A/Fujian/411/02-like influenza viruses are responsible for antigenic drift from A/Panama/2007/99. , 2005, Virology.

[4]  C. Bender,et al.  Differences in the biological phenotype of low-yielding (L) and high-yielding (H) variants of swine influenza virus A/NJ/11/76 are associated with their different receptor-binding activity. , 1998, Virology.

[5]  Cecile Viboud,et al.  Stochastic Processes Are Key Determinants of Short-Term Evolution in Influenza A Virus , 2006, PLoS pathogens.

[6]  N. Dimmock Mechanisms of neutralization of animal viruses. , 1984, The Journal of general virology.

[7]  J. Skehel,et al.  Receptor-binding characteristics of monoclonal antibody-selected antigenic variants of influenza virus , 1987, Journal of virology.

[8]  Giovanni Cardone,et al.  Influenza virus pleiomorphy characterized by cryoelectron tomography , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Yewdell,et al.  The antigenic structure of the influenza virus A/PR/8/34 hemagglutinin (H1 subtype) , 1982, Cell.

[10]  S. Teneberg,et al.  Avian influenza A viruses differ from human viruses by recognition of sialyloligosaccharides and gangliosides and by a higher conservation of the HA receptor-binding site. , 1997, Virology.

[11]  G. Air,et al.  Evolving complexities of influenza virus and its receptors. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[12]  R. Webster,et al.  Antigenic variation in three distinct determinants of an influenza type A haemagglutinin molecule , 1979, Nature.

[13]  J. Yewdell,et al.  Selection of influenza A virus adsorptive mutants by growth in the presence of a mixture of monoclonal antihemagglutinin antibodies , 1986, Journal of virology.

[14]  A. Lapedes,et al.  Mapping the Antigenic and Genetic Evolution of Influenza Virus , 2004, Science.

[15]  J. Skehel,et al.  Variation and infectivity neutralization in influenza , 2006, Immunology.

[16]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.