The effect of normalization tools on green energy sources selection using multi-criteria decision-making approach: A case study in India

Selection of green sources for any region is a very tedious task as it involves several parameters specific to that particular region. This paper aims to select the optimum green energy sources by integrating multiple local factors inspired by a multi-criteria decision-making approach. An integrated multi-criterion decision-making analysis-entropy-complex proportional assessment is used to select the optimal green energy sources from a set of alternatives, viz., solar, hydro, biogas, and biomass, by appraising its main operational features. Initially, the entropy method is used to minimize the impreciseness in data and extract the precise weight from the inconsistency of data using beneficial and non-beneficial criteria. Then, the optimum sources are selected using the complex proportional assessment method as it considers both beneficial and non-beneficial criteria. Finally, the effect of various normalization tools on the assessment of performance ranking is also performed. An illustrative case study is presented to demonstrate the application feasibility of the integrated methodology. The analyzed result shows that hydro is the optimum green energy source (cost being the most influencing factor) having the highest score value followed by other sources, appraised by the integrated methodology. The research output is helpful in identifying the potential green energy sources and promoting investment in the green energy sector on a broader scale which will eventually have a global impact on the society. The study can also be used to support decision making in different situations and by various actors.Selection of green sources for any region is a very tedious task as it involves several parameters specific to that particular region. This paper aims to select the optimum green energy sources by integrating multiple local factors inspired by a multi-criteria decision-making approach. An integrated multi-criterion decision-making analysis-entropy-complex proportional assessment is used to select the optimal green energy sources from a set of alternatives, viz., solar, hydro, biogas, and biomass, by appraising its main operational features. Initially, the entropy method is used to minimize the impreciseness in data and extract the precise weight from the inconsistency of data using beneficial and non-beneficial criteria. Then, the optimum sources are selected using the complex proportional assessment method as it considers both beneficial and non-beneficial criteria. Finally, the effect of various normalization tools on the assessment of performance ranking is also performed. An illustrative case study is...

[1]  Cunbin Li,et al.  Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criterion decision-making for renewable energy: A case study in Jilin , 2018 .

[2]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. , 2011 .

[3]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2003 .

[4]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia: users’ perspective , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[5]  Manish Pal,et al.  Development of the location suitability index for wave energy production by ANN and MCDM techniques , 2016 .

[6]  Beyzanur Cayir Ervural,et al.  An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey's energy planning , 2018 .

[7]  Dragan Komljenovic,et al.  A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia , 2016 .

[8]  Yufeng Deng,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures under lateral impact , 2015 .

[9]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania , 2016 .

[10]  C. Potolias,et al.  A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece , 2013 .

[11]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations , 2017 .

[12]  Zoran M. Markovic,et al.  Modification of TOPSIS method for solving of multicriteria tasks , 2010 .

[13]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis model for a stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system , 2016 .

[14]  Marco Cannemi,et al.  Modeling decision making as a support tool for policy making on renewable energy development , 2014 .

[15]  Rouzbeh Shad,et al.  Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: Case study in Mashhad city , 2017 .

[16]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey , 2016 .

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making , 2013 .

[18]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  A novel integrated decision-making approach for the evaluation and selection of renewable energy technologies , 2018, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[19]  Yu-Long Chen,et al.  Critical factors affecting the development of renewable energy power generation: Evidence from China , 2018 .

[20]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers , 2009, Informatica.

[21]  A. Manzella,et al.  Environmental and social aspects of geothermal energy in Italy , 2018 .

[22]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[23]  M. Kabak,et al.  Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology , 2014 .

[24]  Stelios Rozakis,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units , 2015 .

[25]  Michaël Aklin,et al.  Social acceptance of new energy technology in developing countries: A framing experiment in rural India , 2018 .

[26]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Selection of sustainable alternative energy source for shipping: Multi-criteria decision making under incomplete information , 2017 .

[27]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[28]  Numan Çelebi,et al.  Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Manik Chandra Das,et al.  A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology , 2012 .

[30]  Ali Jahan,et al.  A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design , 2015 .

[31]  Amitava Ray,et al.  Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review , 2017 .

[32]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Analysis in Material Selection: Influence of Normalization Tools on COPRAS-G , 2017 .

[33]  Ting Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China , 2018 .

[34]  Ümran Şengül,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey , 2015 .