The hybrid shift: Evidencing a student-driven restructuring of the college classroom

College students progressively come to campus with mobile devices and increasingly use them for academic work. We propose that student appropriation of mobile technology transforms classrooms, regardless of structural format, into online environments where students engage, network, and re-structure in-class learning. Such activities may be facilitated by faculty and intentional interventions, but is principally driven and organically defined by students. This study represents a first step in identifying and understanding this trend, we refer to as a hybrid shift, in which student use of mobile technology restructures traditional face-to-face classes by adding a vibrant, and organic, supplemental learning component. Data informing this research were drawn from qualitative responses from 620 students in Korea and the U.S. Findings from textual analysis evidence student appropriation of technology for academic purposes, their desire for more supportive structures and instructional practices, as well as teaching and learning implications stemming from this practice. While further research into this occurrence is needed, this study was intended as a preliminary step at identifying the phenomenon to frame and guide continued work. A student-driven structural shift in the college classroom is proposed.Student use of mobile technology for in-class activities is evidenced.Findings are informed by 620 qualitative responses from Korea and U.S. students.Implications for faculty and institutional practices are included.

[1]  Han Woo Park,et al.  GOVERNMENT-CIVIC GROUP CONFLICTS AND COMMUNICATION STRATEGY: A TEXT ANALYSIS OF TV DEBATES ON KOREA'S IMPORT OF U.S. BEEF , 2012 .

[2]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  Blended Learning: Research Perspectives , 2007 .

[3]  Jaeki Song,et al.  An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Reynol Junco,et al.  The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Han Woo Park,et al.  An interview with Loet Leydesdorff: the past, present, and future of the triple helix in the age of big data , 2013, Scientometrics.

[8]  Han Woo Park Examining academic Internet use using a combined method , 2008 .

[9]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Political Discourse Among Key Twitter Users: The Case Of Sejong City In South Korea , 2013 .

[10]  John H. Schuh,et al.  College Student Perceptions of Leadership: Empowering and Constraining Beliefs , 2004 .

[11]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[14]  SongJaeki,et al.  An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior , 2012 .

[15]  Tracy Ann Kent The Faculty-Student Relationship Dynamic: A Study of Faculty Who Teach Online Courses at a Public Four-year University , 2013 .

[16]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  Student Perceptions of Hybrid Courses: Measuring and Interpreting Quality , 2008 .

[17]  Michael M. Grant,et al.  Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[19]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[20]  Han Woo Park,et al.  A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West , 2013 .

[21]  Ting Wang,et al.  Co-word Analysis of Open-End Answers from Chinese Internet Users , 2009 .

[22]  B. Wellman Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[23]  Jill Attewell,et al.  Modernising Education and Training: Mobilising Technology for Learning. , 2010 .

[24]  Emily C. Johnson,et al.  And Never the Two Shall Meet?: Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Online Courses , 2009 .

[25]  Antonio Fini,et al.  Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Han Woo Park,et al.  A Mixed Text Analysis of User Comments on a Portal Site : The `BBK Scandal' in the 2007 Presidential Election of South Korea , 2009 .

[27]  Melissa Cole,et al.  Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Convenience or credibility? A study of college student online research behaviors , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[29]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Blending In The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States , 2007 .

[30]  Wan Ng,et al.  Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Textual analysis of a political message: the inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents , 2010 .

[32]  G. D. Chen,et al.  Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Yaacov J. Katz,et al.  Affect and digital learning at the university level , 2011 .

[34]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging "big data" research , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[35]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A theory of learning for the mobile age: learning through conversation and exploration across contexts , 2010 .

[36]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  A five-year study of sustaining blended learning initiatives to enhance academic engagement in computer and information sciences campus courses , 2013 .

[37]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[38]  Educause 7 Things You Should Know About...Google Apps , 2008 .

[39]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[40]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Gordon Lee,et al.  Blended Learning: The View Is Different from Student, Teacher, or Institution Perspective , 2013, ICHL.

[42]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Arab Spring Effects on Meanings for Islamist Web Terms and on Web Hyperlink Networks among Muslim-Majority Nations: A Naturalistic Field Experiment , 2014 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text , 2004 .

[44]  Devan Rosen,et al.  Procedures for Analyses of Online Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Pam Arroway,et al.  Mobile IT in higher education 2011 , 2011 .

[46]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Big data: From beginning to future , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[47]  Educause Developing a Campus Mobile Strategy: Guidelines, Tools, and Best Practices , 2014 .

[48]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2013 .

[49]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge Society , 2002, J. Documentation.

[50]  Mike Joy,et al.  A Mobile Context-aware Framework for Managing Learning Schedules - Data Analysis from a Diary Study , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[51]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Mobile learning: research, practice and challenges , 2013 .

[52]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[53]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Pervasive, lifestyle‐integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study , 2007 .

[54]  R. Leipzig,et al.  The impact of E-learning in medical education. , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[55]  J. P. Biddix,et al.  Relational Leadership and Technology: A Study of Activist College Women Leaders , 2010 .