Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue

Sound pressure level (SPL) has received little attention as a distance cue or signal for communication because of the methodological difficulty of determining source SPL from free-ranging signallers and because SPL is presumed to be unreliable as a distance cue. Eastern towhees, Pipilo erythrophthalmus (Emberizidae, Passeriformes), in south-central Florida give a simple call during territorial interactions. I obtained measurements of call-source SPL with a calibrated microphone positioned 100+/-10 cm from caged male eastern towhees. Measurements of source SPL were highly variable, but much of this variation can be predicted from measurements of call duration or call frequency variables (spectrotemporal variables). Male towhees accurately perceived the distance of a speaker after it played synthetic calls that matched the amplitude and structure of natural 84-dB and 78-dB call types. Subjects flew further in response to an attenuated (-6 or -12 dB) version of an otherwise identical 84-dB call and flew shorter in response to an amplified (+6 dB) version of this same call. Towhees misjudged speaker distance in approximately half of the trials that included a discrepancy (-6, -12 or +6 dB SPL) between playback source SPL and predicted spectrotemporal variables. These distance errors suggest that towhees assess auditory distance partly from the difference between perceived SPL and source SPL, determined from spectrotemporal variables. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

[1]  David N. Ewert.  Development of Song of a Rufous-Sided Towhee Raised in Acoustic Isolation , 1979 .

[2]  R. Haven Wiley.  Ranging reconsidered , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  V. V. van Heuven,et al.  Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[5]  Søren H. Nielsen,et al.  Auditory Distance Perception in Different Rooms , 1993 .

[6]  F. T. Awbrey.  Social Interaction Among Chorusing Pacific Tree Frogs, Hyla regilla , 1978 .

[7]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  Degradation and signal ranging in birds: memory matters , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  J. F. Brandt,et al.  Vocal loudness and effort in continuous speech. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  4 – Auditory Perception in Birds , 1982 .

[10]  T. Dabelsteen.  The Sound Pressure Level in the Dawn Song of the Blackbird Tardus merula and a Method for Adjusting the Level in Experimental Song to the Level in Natural Song , 1981 .

[11]  Patrick R. Green,et al.  Perception and Motor Control in Birds , 1994, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  R. D. Glave,et al.  Is the effort dependence of speech loudness explicable on the basis of acoustical cues? , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  W. Abrahamson,et al.  Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station, Florida: an example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge , 1984 .

[14]  R J Dooling,et al.  Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Marc Naguib.  Perception of degradation in acoustic signals and its implications for ranging , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Eugene S. Morton.  Reply to Naguib and Wiley , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  D. Mershon,et al.  Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance , 1975 .

[19]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[20]  B. S. Nelson,et al.  Accuracy of auditory distance and azimuth perception by a passerine bird in natural habitat , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Sound Cues to Distance: The Perception of Range , 1994 .

[22]  J. Krebs,et al.  Spacing and calling in Pacific tree frogs, Hyla regilla , 1975 .

[23]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 6.1 base system user's guide , 1990 .

[24]  S. Baird,et al.  The birds of North America , 1974 .

[25]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  ESTIMATION OF DISTANCE OF SINGING CONSPECIFICS BY THE CAROLINA WREN , 1981 .

[26]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Acoustic cues mediate inter-male spacing in a neotropical frog , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  F. Goller,et al.  Motor Correlates of Vocal Diversity in Songbirds , 1997 .

[28]  M. Ryan.  Energy, calling, and selection , 1988 .

[29]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  6 – Grading, Discreteness, Redundancy, and Motivation-Structural Rules , 1982 .