Perception of Quantitative Information for Treatment Decisions

The study was designed to determine which formats for displaying quantities, such as probabilities of treatment risks and benefits, are perceived most accurately and easily by patients. Accuracy and speed of processing were compared for six different presentation formats: pie charts, vertical bars, horizontal bars, numbers, systematic ovals, and random ovals. Quantities were used in two tasks: a choice task that required larger/smaller judgments and an estimate task that required more precise evaluation. The impacts of blue-yellow color and of a treatment-decision context on performance in the two tasks were also investigated. The study included four experiments. Taken together the results suggest that the formats best for making a choice differ from those best for estimating the size of an amount. For making a choice, vertical bars, horizontal bars, numbers, and systematic ovals were equally well perceived; pie charts and random ovals caused slower and less accurate performances. For estimating, numbers led to the most accurate estimates, followed by systematic ovals. The other four formats led to the least accurate estimates. Color and context did not alter which formats were best. Key words: decision making; quantitative information presentation; questionnaire format. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:228-238)

[1]  A Heathcote,et al.  Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Bryan Rodgers,et al.  What does a Man do after he Makes an Error? An Analysis of Response Programming , 1977 .

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Tabular and Graphic Data Presentation , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[5]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays , 1981 .

[6]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  What Questions Do Patients with Curable Prostate Cancer Want Answered? , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  B Brandt,et al.  Informational needs and selected variables in patients receiving brachytherapy. , 1991, Oncology nursing forum.

[8]  D. Mazur,et al.  What should patients be told prior to a medical procedure? Ethical and legal perspectives on medical informed consent. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  Stephens St.  Patient education materials: are they readable? , 1992 .

[10]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  W A Rushton,et al.  Visual pigments and color blindness. , 1975, Scientific American.

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[14]  R. M. Evans.  The Perception of Color , 1974 .

[15]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[16]  T. Quill,et al.  Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach. , 1983, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  C. Meade,et al.  Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature. , 1992, Oncology nursing forum.

[18]  S Redman,et al.  Cancer patient satisfaction with care , 1990, Cancer.

[19]  Thomas G. Gutheil,et al.  Malpractice Prevention through the Sharing of Uncertainty , 1984 .

[20]  James E. Till,et al.  Are We Getting Informed Consent from Patients with Cancer? , 1992 .

[21]  S. Wang,et al.  The Effects of Modes of Information Presentation on Decision-Making: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  S. Jubelirer,et al.  Reading versus comprehension: implications for patient education and consent in an outpatient oncology clinic. , 1994, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[23]  C. Rose,et al.  Information for cancer patients entering a clinical trial--an evaluation of an information strategy. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[24]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[25]  W. S. Cleveland,et al.  Human factors and behavioral science: Experiments on quantitative judgments of graphs and maps , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[26]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[27]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[28]  S Kreitler,et al.  Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. , 1992, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[30]  D. Tritchler,et al.  Cancer Patients: Their Desire for Information and Participation in Treatment Decisions , 1989, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach , 1986, CACM.

[32]  Stephen Wear.  The Informed Consent Event , 1993 .

[33]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphic displays in decision making — the visual salience effect , 1990 .

[34]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[35]  R. E. Christ.  Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays , 1975 .

[36]  D Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Using a Treatment-tradeoff Method to Elicit Preferences for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.