Timing the onset of sulfate reduction over multiple subsurface acetate amendments by measurement and modeling of sulfur isotope fractionation.

Stable isotope fractionations of sulfur are reported for three consecutive years of acetate-enabled uranium bioremediation at the US Department of Energy's Rifle Integrated Field Research Challenge (IFRC) site. The data show a previously undocumented decrease in the time between acetate addition and the onset of sulfate reducing conditions over subsequent amendments, from 20 days in the 2007 experiment to 4 days in the 2009 experiment. Increased sulfide concentrations were observed at the same time as δ(34)S of sulfate enrichment in the first year, but in subsequent years elevated sulfide was detected up to 15 days after increased δ(34)S of sulfate. A biogeochemical reactive transport model is developed which explicitly incorporates the stable isotopes of sulfur to simulate fractionation during the 2007 and 2008 amendments. A model based on an initially low, uniformly distributed population of sulfate reducing bacteria that grow and become spatially variable with time reproduces measured trends in solute concentration and δ(34)S, capturing the change in onset of sulfate reduction in subsequent years. Our results demonstrate a previously unrecognized hysteretic effect in the spatial distribution of biomass growth during stimulated subsurface bioremediation.

[1]  Li Li,et al.  Mineral transformation and biomass accumulation associated with uranium bioremediation at Rifle, Colorado. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Q. Jin,et al.  Predicting the rate of microbial respiration in geochemical environments , 2005 .

[3]  W. Riley,et al.  Mathematical treatment of isotopologue and isotopomer speciation and fractionation in biochemical kinetics , 2009 .

[4]  Christoph Merz,et al.  Sulfide oxidation and sulfate reduction in a shallow groundwater system (Oderbruch Aquifer, Germany) , 2003 .

[5]  Donald R. Metzler,et al.  Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Philip E. Long,et al.  Microbiological and Geochemical Heterogeneity in an In Situ Uranium Bioremediation Field Site , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  J. Lloyd,et al.  The Impact of Fe(III)-reducing Bacteria on Uranium Mobility , 2006 .

[8]  Edward R. Landa,et al.  Microbial reduction of uranium , 1991, Nature.

[9]  T. Prabhakar Clement,et al.  Processes in Microbial Transport in the Natural Subsurface , 2003 .

[10]  Yilin Fang,et al.  Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: Field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[11]  K. Knöller,et al.  Sulfur cycling and biodegradation in contaminated aquifers: insights from stable isotope investigations. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Hubbard,et al.  Effects of physical and geochemical heterogeneities on mineral transformation and biomass accumulation during biostimulation experiments at Rifle, Colorado. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[13]  D. Lovley Bioremediation of organic and metal contaminants with dissimilatory metal reduction , 1995, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[14]  Regina A. O'Neil,et al.  Potential for Quantifying Expression of the Geobacteraceae Citrate Synthase Gene To Assess the Activity of Geobacteraceae in the Subsurface and on Current-Harvesting Electrodes , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  James A. Davis,et al.  Acetate Availability and its Influence on Sustainable Bioremediation of Uranium-Contaminated Groundwater , 2011 .

[16]  P. Long,et al.  Phase preference by active, acetate-utilizing bacteria at the rifle, CO integrated field research challenge site. , 2011, Environmental Science and Technology.

[17]  K. Williams,et al.  Sulfur isotopes as indicators of amended bacterial sulfate reduction processes influencing field scale uranium bioremediation. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Steven B. Yabusaki,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport modeling of uranium bioremediation field experiments , 2009 .

[19]  David W Blowes,et al.  34S/32S fractionation during sulfate reduction in groundwater treatment systems: reactive transport modeling. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Yilin Fang,et al.  Variably saturated flow and multicomponent biogeochemical reactive transport modeling of a uranium bioremediation field experiment. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[21]  D. Canfield Isotope fractionation by natural populations of sulfate-reducing bacteria , 2001 .

[22]  F. Maggi Transient competitive complexation in biological kinetic isotope fractionation explains non-steady isotopic effects: Theory and application to denitrification in soils , 2009 .

[23]  Andrew W. Dale,et al.  Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in marine sediments from the Skagerrak (Denmark): II. Reaction-transport modeling , 2008 .

[24]  James A. Davis,et al.  Approaches to surface complexation modeling of Uranium(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments , 2004 .

[25]  Stephen J. Callister,et al.  Analysis of biostimulated microbial communities from two field experiments reveals temporal and spatial differences in proteome profiles. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  W. Brand,et al.  Online Sulfur-Isotope Determination Using an Elemental Analyzer Coupled to a Mass Spectrometer , 1994 .