Differential Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations in brain networks after BCI Training with and without tDCS in Stroke

Mapping the brain alterations post stroke and post intervention is important for rehabilitation therapy development. Previous work has shown changes in functional connectivity based on resting-state fMRI, structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI and perfusion as a result of brain-computer interface-assisted motor imagery (MI-BCI) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation. Besides functional connectivity, regional amplitude of local low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) may provide complementary information on the underlying neural mechanism in disease. Yet, findings on spontaneous brain activity during resting-state in stroke patients after intervention are limited and inconsistent. Here, we sought to investigate the different brain alteration patterns induced by tDCS compared to MI-BCI for upper-limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients using resting-state fMRI-based ALFF method. Our results suggested that stroke patients have lower ALFF in the ipsilesional somatomotor network compared to controls at baseline. Increased ALFF at contralesional somatomotor network and alterations in higher-level cognitive networks such as the default mode network (DMN) and salience networks accompany motor recovery after intervention; though the MI-BCI alone group and MI-BCI combined with tDCS group exhibit differential patterns.

[1]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[3]  S. Cramer,et al.  Motor imagery during movement activates the brain more than movement alone after stroke: a pilot study. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain plasticity following MI-BCI training combined with tDCS in a randomized trial in chronic subcortical stroke subjects: a preliminary study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Y. Zang,et al.  Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI , 2007, Brain and Development.

[6]  Vivek Prabhakaran,et al.  Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain-computer interface , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[7]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Structural Damage and Functional Reorganization in Ipsilesional M1 in Well-Recovered Patients With Subcortical Stroke , 2014, Stroke.

[8]  C. DeCarli,et al.  Low-frequency oscillations in default mode subnetworks are associated with episodic memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease , 2017, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Motor imagery BCI for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: An evaluation of the EEG recordings using coherence analysis , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  Leonardo G. Cohen,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation , 2006, NeuroRX.

[11]  D. Corbett,et al.  Bi‐hemispheric contribution to functional motor recovery of the affected forelimb following focal ischemic brain injury in rats , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain–Computer Interface for Neurorehabilitation of Upper Limb After Stroke , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Impact of Neurologic Deficits on Motor Imagery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evaluations , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.

[16]  Meigen Liu,et al.  Modulation of event-related desynchronization during motor imagery with transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with severe hemiparetic stroke: a case report. , 2011, The Keio journal of medicine.

[17]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and EEG-based motor imagery BCI for upper limb stroke rehabilitation , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[20]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[21]  O. Martynova,et al.  Functional connectivity between salience, default mode and frontoparietal networks in post-stroke depression. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[22]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..

[23]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging , 2016, Neuroinformatics.

[25]  J. Baron,et al.  Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke? , 2006, Stroke.

[26]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012 .