University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison

In current science policies, competition and output incentives are emphasized as a means of making university systems efficient and productive. By comparing eight countries, this article analyzes how funding environments of university research vary across countries and whether more competitive funding systems are more efficient in producing scientific publications. The article shows that there are significant differences in the competitiveness of funding systems, but no straightforward connection between financial incentives and the efficiency of university systems exists. Our results provoke questions about whether financial incentives boost publication productivity, and whether policy-makers should place greater emphasis on other factors relevant to high productivity.

[1]  Georg Krücken,et al.  Learning the `New, New Thing': On the role of path dependency in university structures , 2003 .

[2]  Arie Rip,et al.  The post-modern research system , 1996 .

[3]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[4]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance , 2002, Scientometrics.

[5]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Investing in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research , 1990 .

[6]  H. Skoie Basic research — a new funding climate? , 1996 .

[7]  D. Braun,et al.  The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science , 1998 .

[8]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  G. Laudel The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions , 2006 .

[10]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[11]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[12]  P. Vanden Abeele,et al.  On research efficiency: A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management , 2005 .

[13]  Beatriz Ruivo ‘Phases’ or ‘paradigms’ of science policy? , 1994 .

[14]  C. Hood The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[15]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981-2002 , 2008 .

[16]  Benedetto Lepori Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators , 2006 .

[17]  Teresa R. Behrens,et al.  Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .

[18]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy , 2000 .

[19]  Hans Vossensteyn,et al.  Keeping up Performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education , 2001 .

[20]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[21]  J. Espinosa,et al.  European Comparison of Public Research Systems , 1999 .

[22]  Mathieu Albert,et al.  Universities and the market economy: The differential impact on knowledge production in sociology and economics , 2003 .

[23]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  New Public Management , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration.

[24]  Barend van der Meulen,et al.  Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science , 1998 .

[25]  Stelvia Matos,et al.  Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? , 2006 .

[26]  John Ziman,et al.  "Post-Academic Science": Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms , 1996 .

[27]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[28]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[29]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[30]  Oili-Helena Ylijoki,et al.  Research for Whom? Research Orientations in Three Academic Cultures , 2001 .

[31]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research , 1999 .

[32]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[33]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[34]  William R. Shadish,et al.  The Social Psychology of Science , 1995 .

[35]  B. Jongbloed Steering the Dutch academic research enterprise: Universities' responses to project funding and performance funding , 2007 .

[36]  U. Schimank,et al.  Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems , 2000 .

[37]  Ingo Liefner,et al.  Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems , 2003 .

[38]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[39]  B. Martin,et al.  University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison , 2003 .