Multi-criteria decision making for the selection of CAD/CAM system

Manufacturers in this global market must rely on new technologies to gain a competitive advantage. Globalization has made a market where competitive advantage is essential not to sustain the market but even to survive. In this scenario, there is rapid advancement in automation of production processes with the application of computers right from the stage of design till the consumption point. Computer-aided design (CAD) and manufacturing systems have a history in assisting companies in design and high-speed manufacturing. Complex parts can be designed quicker with software that enables the user to visually see the part and its dimensions. These software programs can provide the compatibility to assemble parts together, checking for fit while also providing the capability to edit the part at any time. This allows complex designs to be made quicker, and more accurately. Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) packages allow these complex parts to be brought to life by calculating tool paths and writing the code to manufacture the part on a computer numerical controlled (CNC) machine such as a milling machine or lathe. Human error is reduced and higher accuracy can be attained when manufacturing parts that would be difficult to produce manually. Globally and locally there are companies using obsolete packages to design and manufacture products. Since technology is changing very rapidly and most companies cannot update with the technological advancements. The need to know what CAD/CAM packages are available and how to select one will help companies build for the future. In this paper an approach is made to find the best or suitable packages among four available software packages for a small manufacturing firm.

[1]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[2]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Multi‐attribute analysis of ISO 9000 registration using AHP , 1998 .

[4]  Huan-Jyh Shyur,et al.  COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  David J. Carney,et al.  A basis for evaluation of commercial software , 1998, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Ruhul A. Sarker,et al.  Application of multimedia technology in manufacturing: a review , 1999 .

[7]  Anand Teltumbde,et al.  A framework for evaluating ERP projects , 2000 .

[8]  Eddie W.L. Cheng,et al.  Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2001, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[9]  G. Kannan,et al.  Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment , 2006 .

[10]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Software selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Hokey Min,et al.  Selection of Software: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992 .

[12]  Zhishun Wang,et al.  Blind EGG separation using ICA neural networks , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[13]  Jyrki Kontio,et al.  A case study in applying a systematic method for COTS selection , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[14]  R. Sundarraj,et al.  Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies , 2000 .

[15]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection , 2001 .

[16]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection , 2005 .

[17]  Hareton K. N. Leung,et al.  On the efficiency of domain-based COTS product selection method , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[18]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Pen–tablet as a CAD interface alternative , 2005 .

[19]  Madan G. Singh,et al.  Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[20]  C. Carlsson,et al.  AHP in Political Group Decisions: A Study in the Art of Possibilities , 1995 .

[21]  Gavin R. Finnie,et al.  Prioritizing software development productivity factors using the analytic hierarchy process , 1993, J. Syst. Softw..

[22]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[23]  Ibrahim Zeid,et al.  CAD/CAM theory and practice , 1991 .