Capacity for Visual Features in Mental Rotation

Although mental rotation is a core component of scientific reasoning, little is known about its underlying mechanisms. For instance, how much visual information can someone rotate at once? We asked participants to rotate a simple multipart shape, requiring them to maintain attachments between features and moving parts. The capacity of this aspect of mental rotation was strikingly low: Only one feature could remain attached to one part. Behavioral and eye-tracking data showed that this single feature remained “glued” via a singular focus of attention, typically on the object’s top. We argue that the architecture of the human visual system is not suited for keeping multiple features attached to multiple parts during mental rotation. Such measurement of capacity limits may prove to be a critical step in dissecting the suite of visuospatial tools involved in mental rotation, leading to insights for improvement of pedagogy in science-education contexts.

[1]  Brian V. Funt,et al.  A Parallel-Process Model of Mental Rotation , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Steven L Franconeri,et al.  The Head of the Table: Marking the “Front” of An Object Is Tightly Linked with Selection , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Stieff.  Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science , 2007 .

[4]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us? , 2013, Cognitive Processing.

[7]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Pictorial Encoding of Sentences in Sentence—Picture Comparison , 1975 .

[10]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Marois,et al.  Attentive tracking disrupts feature binding in visual working memory , 2009, Visual cognition.

[12]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Estimated capacity of object files in visual short-term memory is not improved by retrieval cueing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  Daniel A. Gajewski,et al.  Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Tracking unique objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Diederich,et al.  Individual Differences in Mental Rotation Piecemeal Versus Holistic Processing , 2012 .

[20]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  J. Hochberg,et al.  The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[22]  M. Hegarty.  Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  N. Newcombe,et al.  How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Computer and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability , 2005 .

[24]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[25]  N. Newcombe.  Picture This: Increasing Math and Science Learning by Improving Spatial Thinking. , 2010 .

[26]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Overwriting and rebinding: Why feature-switch detection tasks underestimate the binding capacity of visual working memory , 2009 .

[27]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[28]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[29]  R. Luce,et al.  Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Long-term memory and mental rotation. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[31]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. , 1981 .

[32]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 2022 .

[33]  T. Mueller.  Learning to Think Spatially , 2006 .

[34]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[35]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[36]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Steven P. Shwartz,et al.  On the demystification of mental imagery , 1979, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  The rate of “mental rotation” of images: A test of a holistic analogue hypothesis , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .

[40]  Wolfgang Lehmann,et al.  Mental Rotation Test Performance in Four Cross-Cultural Samples (N = 3367): Overall Sex Differences and the Role of Academic Program in Performance , 2006, Cortex.

[41]  Brice Isableu,et al.  Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[43]  Bryna C. Kumi,et al.  Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a stem domain. , 2014 .