Innovative Approaches to Option Generation

Central and local governments often employ sophisticated modelling and appraisal procedures to ensure that the transport strategies and schemes that are selected for implementation meet policy objectives and are economically efficient. But relatively little effort has been made by the profession to develop methods to assist with the generation of appropriate and innovative options which form the core inputs to this whole process. The paper first summarises UK local authority views about the importance of option generation and their current ability to develop suitable options. It then provides an overview of methods that have been used in a variety of disciplines and policy areas to generate options. Some mainly represent or package existing knowledge, while others encourage ‘outside-the-box’ thinking, with the aim of developing solutions that have not previously been thought of. Methods range from those that are highly quantitative and replicable, to others that are qualitative and much more subjective in nature. Four option generation tools developed as part of the DISTILLATE project are described and illustrated with case study examples. Two apply at the strategic level; one is designed to assist in selecting packages of measures that contribute to an urban transport/land use strategy, while the other assists in identifying accessibility problems experienced by different population groups, and in generating a range of potential solutions. The other two apply at the scheme level and are more participatory in nature; they deal with streetspace allocation and with the improvement of community spaces.

[1]  P. Jones,et al.  ‘HATS’: A Technique for Investigating Household Decisions , 1979 .

[2]  S. Cinderby How Communities Can Use Geographical Information Systems , 2007 .

[3]  Anthony D. May,et al.  The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages , 2008 .

[4]  Bryan Matthews,et al.  Improving Decision-Making for Sustainable Urban Transport , 2007 .

[5]  Paul Pfaffenbichler,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Model Use , 2009 .

[6]  Peter Jones,et al.  Identifying the accessibility problems of disadvantaged groups and generating solutions. Application to the Barnsley Dearne area of South Yorkshire. , 2008 .

[7]  John Luckman,et al.  An Approach to the Management of Design , 1967 .

[8]  Map Taylor,et al.  KONSULT: DEVELOPING AN INTERNATIONAL KNOWLEDGEBASE ON URBAN TRANSPORT POLICY INSTRUMENTS , 2002 .

[9]  Bryan Matthews,et al.  Facilitating Evidence-Based Decision-Making – The Development and Use of an On-Line Knowledgebase on Sustainable Land-Use and Transport , 2004 .

[10]  G. Hoinville,et al.  Evaluating Community Preferences , 1971 .

[11]  Guido Antonius Vonk,et al.  Improving Planning Support : The use of planning support systems for spatial planning , 2006 .

[12]  G. Walker,et al.  Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning , 2005 .

[13]  Peter Jones,et al.  DISTILLATE, Project B: Option Generation - Literature Review , 2005 .

[14]  S. Cinderby,et al.  Suspicious cartographers: Some realities of research into stakeholder understanding of the causes and possible prevention of breast cancer , 2007 .

[15]  Rod Eddington,et al.  The Eddington Transport Study: Main Report - Transport's Role in Sustaining the UK's Productivity and Competitiveness , 2006 .

[16]  Peter Jones,et al.  Tools for Road User Charging (RUC) Scheme Option Generation , 2005 .

[17]  John Forrester,et al.  Participatory GIS and its application in governance: the example of air quality and the implications for noise pollution , 2008 .

[18]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A creativity-based design process for innovative product design , 2004 .

[19]  Greg Marsden,et al.  The Role of Indicators, Targets and Monitoring in Decision-Support for Transport , 2009, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[20]  A May,et al.  Improving Decision-making for Sustainable Urban Transport: An Introduction to The DISTILLATE Research Programme , 2009 .

[21]  Peter Jones,et al.  Engaging with professional stakeholders in the Dearne Valley Area of South Yorkshire. Strategic problem identification and option generation: the case of Accessibility Planning , 2008 .

[22]  Andrew J. Cook,et al.  DISTILLATE: A KonSULT-based strategy option generator , 2008 .

[23]  Angela Hull,et al.  Implementing Innovatory Transport Measures: What Local Authorities in the UK Say About Their Problems and Requirements , 2009 .

[24]  H. Couclelis “Where has the Future Gone?” Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning , 2005 .

[25]  Angela Hull Barriers to the delivery of sustainable transport solutions , 2009 .

[26]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners , 2008 .

[27]  S. King,et al.  Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation , 1989 .

[28]  Charlotte Kelly,et al.  Enhancing appraisal methods to support sustainable transport and land use , 2009 .

[29]  John Forrester,et al.  Facilitating the local governance of air pollution using GIS for participation , 2005 .

[30]  R. Eddington The Eddington transport study: the case for action: Sir Rod Eddington's advice to Government , 2006 .