Language Learners' Extrapolation of Word Order in Micro-Artificial Languages*

This article is concerned with the ability of language learners to extrapolate from the word order in one type of phrase to that in another, namely from the order in the verb phrase (VP) to the orders in the prepositional (PP) and noun phrases (NP) and from the verb phrase order plus either the prepositional-phrase order or the noun-phrase order to the other phrase type. Such extrapolation relates both to the implicational universals of possible word orders in language described by Hawkins (1983) and to the head parameter of Government/Binding Theory (Chomsky, 1986a, 1986b, 1988). This article describes an experiment with eight Micro-Artificial Languages (MALs) that tested the ability of 409 secondary-school children to extrapolate in this way. The results showed that most learners (340) were highly consistent in ascribing word order and most (321) succeeded in learning the MALs. Four extrapolation strategies followed by the learners that are not covered by the syntactic analyses mentioned are preferences for (1) postpositions, whatever the VP order; (2) adjectives in the same position as objects in the VP; (3) prepositions the same side as adjectives in the NP and objects in the VP; and (4) adjectives before nouns if the VP order and the NP order are consistent. Further research is needed to see if such extrapolation strategies occur in real learning or if they are an artefact of the MAL approach.

[1]  Hiroshi Nagata.  Effectiveness of word order and grammatical marker as syntactic indicators of semantic relations , 1981 .

[2]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners - a study of the acquisition of German word order , 1986 .

[3]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Semantic reference and phrasal grouping in the acquisition of a miniature phrase structure language , 1986 .

[4]  R. S. Tomlin.  The frequency of basic constituent orders , 1984 .

[5]  Fred R. Eckman,et al.  On the Generalization of Relative Clause Instruction in the Acquisition of English as a Second Language1 , 1988 .

[6]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[7]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  Word order and case marking in early child language. Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German , 1986 .

[8]  Hagit Borer,et al.  The Maturation of Syntax , 1987 .

[9]  Barry McLaughlin,et al.  On the use of miniature artificial languages in second-language research , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[10]  B. MacWhinney.  Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults , 1983 .

[11]  D. Sankoff,et al.  The Universal Consistency Hypothesis and the Prediction of Word Order Acquisition Stages in the Speech of Bilingual Children , 1984 .

[12]  S. Gass,et al.  L2 Data: Their Relevance for Language Universals. , 1980 .

[13]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Anchor points in language learning: The role of marker frequency ☆ , 1988 .

[14]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language , 1981 .

[15]  Susan Gas.  LANGUAGE TRANSFER AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS , 1979 .

[16]  J. Hawkins.  Cross-category harmony, X-bar and the predictions of markedness , 1982, Journal of Linguistics.

[17]  Helmut Zobl,et al.  WORD ORDER TYPOLOGY, LEXICAL GOVERNMENT, AND THE PREDICTION OF MULTIPLE, GRADED EFFECTS IN L2 WORD ORDER , 1986 .

[18]  Helen Goodluck.  Language acquisition: Language acquisition and linguistic theory , 1986 .

[19]  J. Hawkins,et al.  Implicational universals as predictors of language acquisition , 1987 .