Structure and composition of altered riparian forests in an agricultural Amazonian landscape.

Deforestation and fragmentation influence the microclimate, vegetation structure, and composition of remaining patches of tropical forest. In the southern Amazon, at the frontier of cropland expansion, forests are converted and fragmented in a pattern that leaves standing riparian forests whose dimensions are mandated by the Brazilian National Forest Code. These altered riparian forests share many characteristics of well-studied upland forest fragments, but differ because they remain connected to larger areas of forest downstream, and because they may experience wetter soil conditions because reduction of forest cover in the surrounding watershed raises groundwater levels and increases stream runoff. We compared forest regeneration, structure, composition, and diversity in four areas of intact riparian forest and four areas each of narrow, medium, and wide altered riparian forests that have been surrounded by agriculture since the early 1980s. We found that seedling abundance was reduced by as much as 64% and sapling abundance was reduced by as much as 67% in altered compared to intact riparian forests. The most pronounced differences between altered and intact forest occurred near forest edges and within the narrowest sections of altered riparian forests. Woody plant species composition differed and diversity was reduced in altered forests compared to intact riparian forests. However, despite being fragmented for several decades, large woody plant biomass and carbon storage, the number of live or dead large woody plants, mortality rates, and the size distribution of woody plants did not differ significantly between altered and intact riparian forests. Thus, even in these relatively narrow forests with high edge: area ratios, we saw no evidence of the increases in mortality and declines in biomass that have been found in other tropical forest fragment studies. However, because of the changes in both species community and reduced regeneration, it is unclear how long this relative lack of change will be sustained. Additionally, Brazil recently passed a law in their National Forest Code allowing narrower riparian buffers than those studied here in restored areas, which could affect their long-term sustainability.

[1]  P. Brando,et al.  Negative fire feedback in a transitional forest of southeastern Amazonia , 2008 .

[2]  M. Tabarelli,et al.  The Nature of Seedling Assemblages in a Fragmented Tropical Landscape: Implications for Forest Regeneration , 2013 .

[3]  R. Betts,et al.  Climate Change, Deforestation, and the Fate of the Amazon , 2008, Science.

[4]  M. Kellman,et al.  Structure and function in two tropical gallery forest communities: implications for forest conservation in fragmented systems , 1998 .

[5]  J. Chambers,et al.  Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  E. Lambin,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .

[7]  J. Benítez‐Malvido,et al.  Impact of Forest Fragmentation on Seedling Abundance in a Tropical Rain Forest , 1998 .

[8]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Cracking Brazil's Forest Code , 2014, Science.

[9]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[10]  D. Bebber,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns of tree community dynamics in a tropical forest fragment in South-east Brazil , 2008, Plant Ecology.

[11]  Jeremy A. Miller,et al.  A STRUCTURED INVENTORY OF APPALACHIAN GRASS BALD AND HEATH BALD SPIDER ASSEMBLAGES AND A TEST OF SPECIES RICHNESS ESTIMATOR PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[12]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments , 2001, Science.

[13]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Estrutura de um trecho de floresta Amazônica na bacia do alto rio Xingu , 2004 .

[14]  O. Phillips,et al.  Diversity, abundance and distribution of lianas of the Cerrado–Amazonian forest transition, Brazil , 2014 .

[15]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land-use-driven stream warming in southeastern Amazonia , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  M. Coe,et al.  Conversion to soy on the Amazonian agricultural frontier increases streamflow without affecting stormflow dynamics , 2011 .

[17]  A. MacDougall,et al.  Riparian habitats as tropical forest refugia , 1991 .

[18]  D. Lobell,et al.  The Influence of Climate Change on Global Crop Productivity1 , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[19]  Nadine Marshall,et al.  Riparian Ecosystems in the 21st Century: Hotspots for Climate Change Adaptation? , 2013, Ecosystems.

[20]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Combined effects of climate and land‐use change on the future of humid tropical forests , 2010 .

[21]  G. B. Williamson,et al.  Receding Forest Edges and Vanishing Reserves , 2000, Science.

[22]  B. Marimon,et al.  Environmental determinants for natural regeneration of gallery forest at the Cerrado/Amazonia boundaries in Brazil , 2010 .

[23]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  J. Scolforo,et al.  Effects of past disturbance and edges on tree community structure and dynamics within a fragment of tropical semideciduous forest in south-eastern Brazil over a five-year period (1987–1992) , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[25]  P. Fearnside Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, Rates, and Consequences , 2005 .

[26]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  E. Davidson,et al.  Watershed responses to Amazon soya bean cropland expansion and intensification , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  B. Bolker,et al.  Fire‐induced tree mortality in a neotropical forest: the roles of bark traits, tree size, wood density and fire behavior , 2012 .

[29]  R. DeFries,et al.  Ecology, economy and management of an agroindustrial frontier landscape in the southeast Amazon , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  J. Mustard,et al.  Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Defending public interests in private lands: compliance, costs and potential environmental consequences of the Brazilian Forest Code in Mato Grosso , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  D. Edwards,et al.  Functional attributes change but functional richness is unchanged after fragmentation of Brazilian Atlantic forests , 2014 .

[33]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Ecosystem productivity and carbon cycling in intact and annually burnt forest at the dry southern limit of the Amazon rainforest (Mato Grosso, Brazil) , 2014 .

[34]  William F. Laurance,et al.  RAIN FOREST FRAGMENTATION AND THE DYNAMICS OF AMAZONIAN TREE COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[35]  J. Chave,et al.  Rapid decay of tree-community composition in Amazonian forest fragments , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Liana allometric biomass equations for Amazonian primary and secondary forest , 2004 .

[37]  J. Tollefson President prunes forest reforms , 2012, Nature.

[38]  C. Gascon,et al.  The conservation value of linear forest remnants in central Amazonia , 1999 .

[39]  J. A. Ratter,et al.  The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity , 1997 .

[40]  S. Smart,et al.  Traits of plant communities in fragmented forests: the relative influence of habitat spatial configuration and local abiotic conditions , 2014 .

[41]  C. Peres,et al.  Conservation Value of Remnant Riparian Forest Corridors of Varying Quality for Amazonian Birds and Mammals , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes , 2006 .

[43]  N. Mahowald,et al.  The fate of phosphorus fertilizer in Amazon soya bean fields , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  A. MacDougall,et al.  The understorey light regime and patterns of tree seedlings in tropical riparian forest patches , 1992 .

[45]  R. Didham,et al.  Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation , 2002 .

[46]  I. Turner Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. , 1996 .

[47]  C. Murcia Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  W. Laurance,et al.  Inferred causes of tree mortality in fragmented and intact Amazonian forests , 2004, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[49]  R. Corlett,et al.  The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  D. V. Sandberg,et al.  Biomass fire consumption and carbon release rates of rainforest-clearing experiments conducted in northern Mato Grosso, Brazil , 2001 .

[51]  Miguel Martínez-Ramos,et al.  Integrating Agricultural Landscapes with Biodiversity Conservation in the Mesoamerican Hotspot , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  V. Kapos Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon , 1989, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[53]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forests , 2002, Nature.

[54]  R. Didham,et al.  Edge Structure Determines the Magnitude of Changes in Microclimate and Vegetation Structure in Tropical Forest Fragments 1 , 1999 .

[55]  John Fox,et al.  GETTING STARTED WITH THE R COMMANDER: A BASIC-STATISTICS GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE TO R , 2005 .

[56]  D. R. Dangol,et al.  Species Composition and Dominance of Plant Communities in Western Chitwan, Nepal , 2001 .

[57]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation , 2005 .

[58]  J. Randerson,et al.  Fire‐related carbon emissions from land use transitions in southern Amazonia , 2008 .

[59]  Dryland Riparian Ecosystems in the American Southwest: Sensitivity and Resilience to Climatic Extremes , 2013, Ecosystems.

[60]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Prospects for land-use sustainability on the agricultural frontier of the Brazilian Amazon , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  M. Kappelle,et al.  Vegetation structure and composition along an interior-edge-exterior gradient in a Costa Rican montane cloud forest. , 2000 .

[62]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Streamside trees that do not use stream water , 1991, Nature.

[63]  S. Ochoa-Gaona,et al.  Impact of silvicultural methods on vascular epiphytes (ferns, bromeliads and orchids) in a temperate forest in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2014 .

[64]  W. Laurance,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation, Variable Edge Effects, and the Landscape-Divergence Hypothesis , 2007, PloS one.

[65]  V. Kapos,et al.  13 C as an Indicator of Edge Effects in Tropical Rainforest Reserves , 1993 .

[66]  G. Williams‐Linera Vegetation structure and environmental conditions of forest edges in Panama. , 1990 .

[67]  Oliver L. Phillips,et al.  Amazon palm biomass and allometry , 2013 .